The european political science agenda: a multilevel analysis from a country perspective
| Autor: | Leiv Marsteintredet, David Doyle, Fátima García Díez, Marcelo Camerlo |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
0211 other engineering and technologies
Face (sociological concept) 02 engineering and technology Politics Political science 050602 political science & public administration Regional science Political philosophy Social science 021110 strategic defence & security studies Divergence (linguistics) Portugal business.industry Norway 05 social sciences Multilevel model Comparative politics Convergence (economics) 0506 political science Publishing Spain Political Science and International Relations business Ireland |
| Zdroj: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instacron:RCAAP |
| Popis: | This presentation introduces the analytical framework applied in this symposium for the analysis of publishing trends of European political scientists. Our goal is to ascertain the degree to which the discipline in four contrasting countries (Ireland, Norway, Portugal and Spain) speaks to a wider European or international audience. Is political science insular in these countries, or is it internationalised? On which aspects are the publications similar at the domestic, European and international levels, and on which do they differ? What dynamics have affected publishing habits over time? Is it possible to observe a process of convergence or divergence across levels over time? To face these questions, we set up a cross-national research team composed of graduate students and professors from the four countries, and created a common dataset that collected information on articles published in the highest ranked national, European and international journals between 1999 and 2014. The findings suggest that political science research in these countries has been running in two separate worlds: the domestic and the foreign levels. Also, the analyses point to a divergence between north and south regarding the predominant fields, topics and the interest for Europe, and institutional concentration. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|