Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence
| Autor: | Andrew M. Southerland, Prachi Mehndiratta, George J. Stukenborg, Gilbert R. Upchurch, Benjamin Z Ball, Bradford B. Worrall, James F. Meschia, Boxiang Jiang |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Diagnostic Imaging
Pediatrics medicine.medical_specialty Percentile Aortic Rupture Cost-Benefit Analysis 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Decision Support Techniques 03 medical and health sciences Aortic aneurysm 0302 clinical medicine Aneurysm Predictive Value of Tests medicine Prevalence Humans Mass Screening Computer Simulation Aortic rupture Prospective cohort study health care economics and organizations Mass screening business.industry Decision Trees Intracranial Aneurysm Health Care Costs medicine.disease Prognosis Quality-adjusted life year Surgery Models Economic Cohort Quality-Adjusted Life Years Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Monte Carlo Method Vascular Surgical Procedures 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal |
| Zdroj: | Journal of vascular surgery. 64(3) |
| ISSN: | 1097-6809 |
| Popis: | Objective Aneurysm rupture is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and evidence suggests shared risk for both abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We hypothesized that screening for AAA in patients with known IA is cost-effective. Methods We used a decision tree model to compare costs and outcomes of AAA screening vs no screening in a hypothetical cohort of patients with IA. We measured expected outcomes using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We performed a Monte Carlo simulation and additional sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of ranging base case variables on model outcomes and identified thresholds where a decision alternative dominated the model (both less expensive and more effective than the alternative). Results In our base case analysis, screening for AAA provided an additional 0.17 QALY (2.5-97.5 percentile: 0.11-0.27 QALY) at a saving of $201 (2.5-97.5 percentile: $−127 to $896). This yielded an ICER of $−1150/QALY (2.5-97.5 percentile: $−4299 to $6374/QALY), that is, screening saves $1150 per QALY gained. Conclusions Based on this model, screening for AAA in individuals with IA is cost-effective at an ICER of $1150/QALY, well below accepted societal thresholds estimated at $60,000/QALY. Cost-effectiveness of cross-screening in these populations is sensitive to aneurysm coprevalence and risk of rupture. Further prospective study is warranted to validate this finding. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|