The Working Mechanisms of Parental Involvement in Interventions for Children with Chronic Illness

Autor: Agnes M. Willemen, Erika Kuzminskaite, Heleen Maurice-Stam, Martha A. Grootenhuis, Bob F. Last, Carlo Schuengel, Linde Scholten
Přispěvatelé: APH - Mental Health, Amsterdam Neuroscience - Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Stress & Sleep, Psychiatry, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, ANS - Amsterdam Neuroscience, APH - Quality of Care, Educational and Family Studies, LEARN! - Child rearing, Clinical Child and Family Studies, APH - Aging & Later Life
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31(11), 3037-3046. Springer New York
Willemen, A M, Kuzminskaite, E, Maurice-Stam, H, Grootenhuis, M A, Last, B F, Schuengel, C & Scholten, L 2022, ' The Working Mechanisms of Parental Involvement in Interventions for Children with Chronic Illness ', Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 3037-3046 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02329-7
Journal of child and family studies, 31(11), 3037-3046. Springer New York
ISSN: 1062-1024
Popis: Children with chronic illness (CI) are at risk for internalizing problems, which reduce their quality of life, hamper treatment, and increase family stress. Accordingly, behavioral interventions are provided at the family level. However, the effects of parental involvement on child outcomes are not consistently beneficial. Therefore, it is relevant to study the working mechanisms. In the present study, we tested child coping and parenting stress as underlying mechanisms of the effect of an intervention for children and an additional group intervention for parents. Data were analyzed from a randomized controlled trial. Families of children with chronic illness (N = 120, child M age = 12.11 years, range 7.98–18.07) participated in a cognitive-behavioral-based group intervention and were randomized in the child-only intervention or parent–child intervention. Primary outcomes were parent- and child-reported internalizing problems, whereas the mediators were the use of child active coping skills and parenting stress. The causal model was tested with multilevel mediation analysis. Active coping skills and parenting stress stood out as significant mediators of the effect of the intervention on parent- and child-reported internalizing behavior (Cohen’s d effect size range 0.29–1.57). When parents were involved in the intervention, children increased their use of active coping skills and parents decreased in parenting stress, which in turn improved child internalizing problems. Knowing that coping skills and parenting stress underlie the benefit of involving parents can be used for optimizing interventions for children with CI and addressing the risk of internalizing problems.
Databáze: OpenAIRE