Oodes (Oodes) tokyoensis Habu 1956

Autor: Guéorguiev, Borislav, Liang, Hongbin
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4480035
Popis: 16. Oodes (Oodes) tokyoensis Habu, 1956 Oodes helopioides tokyoensis Habu, 1956: 82 (type locality: ‘Shakujii, Nerima-ku, Tokyo Metropolis’). References. Oodes (Oodes) helopioides tokyoensis: Habu 1956: 79–80 (identification keys), 82–85 (description; comparison with Oodes helopioides helopioides and Lachnocrepis prolixa); Habu 1958: 194 (distribution in Japan). Oodes helopioides tokyoensis: Lafer 1973: 847–849 (taxonomic notes and comparisons with O. helopioides s.str. and O. integer); Lorenz 1998: 305; Bousquet 2003: 445; Lorenz 2005: 325; Bousquet 2017: 636. Oodes tokyoensis: Lafer 1989: 204 (diagnostic features); Bousquet 1996: 472 (relationships with O. amaroides). Type material. Holotype preserved in the Insect Museum of the National Institute for Agro–Environmental Science, Tsukuba (https://www.naro.affrc.go.jp/org/niaes/type/dbcarabidae/o_tokyoensis.html). Not examined. Other material examined. None. TME: none. Diagnosis. See “Diagnosis” and “Notes” under O. integer. Description. See Habu (1956: 82–84). Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu). Notes. We follow the view of Lafer (1973: 849) that O. tokyoensis is best treated as a distinct species, not a subspecies of O. helopioides. The Russian author based his statement on the fact that the easternmost known locality for the latter species comes from the area of Minusinsk Hollow, south–central Siberia. Hence, a vast area between the Minussinsk Hollow and Japan is not populated by either species, and no hybridization zone exists between them. “ gracilis ” species group Diagnosis. The only species of this group possesses two autapomorphies that distinguish it from other members of Oodes: (1) stria 7 more or less reduced along elytral anterior third (like in taxa of Nanodiodes Bousquet, 1986, but to a far lesser extent); and (2) sclerite of internal sac of median lobe with three sclerotized nail-like spikes (seen in lateral view). This unique set of features suggests that O. gracilis occupies an isolated position in the genus. In addition, the species in question has two other differences compared to other species of Oodes s.str. First, the metacoxal basal sulcus is shortened, ending at the medial fifth; it is a homoplastic state, as it occurs also in O. japonicus and Pseudoodes coelestinus. The second peculiarity is the quite reduced punctuation on thoracic part of body. 17. Oodes (Oodes) gracilis A. Villa & G.B. Villa, 1833 (Figs 21 A–G, Figs 22 A–G, Table 4) Oodes gracilis A. Villa & G.B. Villa, 1833: 33 (type locality: ‘Italia’). Later, the locality was more precisely defined: ‘Alle rive dei laghi in Lombardia’ (Villa & Villa, 1868: 61). = Oodes similis Chaudoir, 1837: 20 (type locality: ‘d’Allemagne’ [Germany]). Synonymy established by Gemminger & Harold (1868: 232). = Oodes gracilior Lambert, 1853: 199 (type locality: ‘bord de l'étang de Marson’, France). Synonymy established by Gemminger & Harold (1868: 232). References. Oodes similis: Chaudoir 1857: 34–35 (comparison with O. helopioides); Motschulsky 1858: 172 (comparisons with O. parallelus Motschulsky and O. parallelogrammus Motschulsky). Oodes gracilior: Fairmaire & Laboulbène 1854: 60 (re-description). Oodes gracilis: Gemminger & Harold 1868: 232; Bedel 1879: 54 (identification key); Bedel 1880: 161; Marseul 1880: 190; Chaudoir 1882: 345 (re-description); Marseul 1882: 28; Ganglbauer 1891a: 384; Fiori 1903: 200 (‘fiume Lamato in Calabria’, Italy); Reitter 1908: 186; Porta 1923: 213; Burmeister 1939: 165 (distribution and ecology); Jeannel 1942: 982; Focarile 1959: 75 (taxonomic notes and comparison with O. helopioides); Fontolan 1959: 120–121 (re-description and comparison with O. helopioides); Magistretti 1965: 257; Allen 1973: 32 (Arkansas Insect Collection); Bousquet 1996: 449– 450 (various data, incl. bibliography), 472 (relationships with O. amaroides); Ortuño 1998: 5–6 (female genitalia); Lorenz 1998: 305; Bousquet 2003: 445; Lorenz 2005: 325; Elderkhanova 2012: 495; Nakhibasheva et al. 2012: 305; Belousov et al. 2014: 96; Ibáñez Orrico 2014: 83 (distribution in Iberian Peninsula); Bousquet 2017: 636. Oodes (Oodes) gracilis: Ganglbauer 1891b: 51; Csiki 1906: 57; Jakobson 1906: 310 (distribution); Csiki 1931: 1007 (‘Mitteleuropa, Mittelmeer–gebiet’); Kryzhanovskij et al. 1995: 158 (distribution in ex-USSR). Type material. Oodes gracilis A. Villa & G.B. Villa: neotype ♂, ‘Oasi Torbiere diAlbate—Bassone (CO) 31.VI.1978 Leg. Sciaky—Pavesi [w, h] // Neotypus Oodes gracilis Villa Det. Sciaky e Pavesi [r, h]’ (MSNM) (Figs 21A, B, 22A, B). Focarile (1959: 75) considered that the description of Villa & Villa (1833) refers to O. helopioides var. fiorii, and not to O. gracilis (sensu Lindroth, 1943). M. Pavesi (pers. comm.) wrote us: “ Several specialists (including me), having not checked carefully enough the collection materials, suspected that the original description of O. gracilis (type locality “rive dei laghi lombardi” = shores of Lombardy lakes) would indeed refer to small, slender individuals of helopioides, since gracilis appeared to be restricted to coastal, brackish biotopes. ”. However, this assumption could not be verified, as the type series of the species together with entire collection of the brothers Villa had been destroyed in the fire of the Museum of Milan in August 1943. In order to maintain the status of O. gracilis, a neotype of this species has been designated (Sciaky & Pavesi 1986). Type material. Oodes similis Chaudoir: Not examined. Type material. Oodes gracilior Lambert: Not examined. Paul Lambert (1853) ascribed the authorship of O. gracilis to Leon Faimaire perhaps because the former author used original notes of the latter author. Soon after, L. Fairmaire (Fairmaire & Laboulbène 1854: 60) gave a second description using the same descriptive terminology. Jeannel (1942: 982) also attributed gracilis to L. Fairmaire. The correct authorship of this form has been indicated by Chaudoir (1882: 345). Other material examined. FRANCE: A u v e r g n e –R h ô n e–A l p e s: 1♀, ‘Dr Jacquet Lyon’ (NMNHS). ALBANIA: Shkodër County: 3♂♂, ‘ALB., Shkodra District Mali Tarabosh Mtn [Mali i Tabaroshit] karst terrain, 100 m 24.XI.2000, A. Zhalov leg.’ (NMNHS). BULGARIA: S i l i s t r a Province: 1♂, ‘BG, Nova Cherna Vill. Ornithological station 19–20.VI.2007, light trap B. Guéorguiev leg.’ (NMNHS); 3♂♂, ‘Srebarna Lake, wharf near the lake, 44.10331, 27.06392, 28–29.V.2017, G. Georgiev, W. Rossi & D. Stoianova’ (NMNHS). Va r n a Province: 1♀, ‘БГ Крапец, Дуранкулашкο блатο; Залив! мοрски брЯГ пοд вοдοр. и камъни [Bulgaria, Krapets, Durankulak Marsh; bay! seashore under algae and stones], 23.7.92 LEG. L. Penev’ (IBER). Sofia Province: 1♂, 1♀, ‘BG, Sofia Distr., Dragomansko blato [Dragoman Marsh], 42.93712, 22.95200, 2.VI.2017 W. Rossi & B. Guéorguiev leg.’ (NMNHS). Burgas Province: 1♀, ‘Страндж еЗерο [Strandza Mt., lake], 2.VI. 9…’ (NMNHS); 1♀, ‘BG: Pomorie bei Burgas SO-Ufer Pomorie–See (6) 09.V.2000 Handfang leg. Wolfg. Beier (Germany)’ (cWB). ISRAEL: North District: 1♂, ‘Israel: Ne’ot Mordekhay 30.V.2005 L. Zarabi V. Chikatunov’ (SMNH-TAU). TME: 15 specimens. TGE: 2♂♂, 1♀. Diagnosis. Distinguished from other Oodes species by features given in the key to species of Oodes. See also “Diagnosis” under “ gracilis ” species group. Description. Habitus. Specimens of middle size (BL: 7.9–9.8 mm, BW: 3.0– 3.9 mm), with subelongate, not very convex body (Figs 21A, C). Ratios and measurements. See Table 4. Color and luster. Body black, pronotum posterolaterally rufous, appendages piceous to rufopiceous. Integument moderately shiny, without iridescence. Punctuation. Dorsal surface without punctuation; prosternum and mesoepisternum nearly smooth, proepisternum and abdominal ventrites at sides finely rugose; abdominal ventrite 6 at apex both finely punctate and rugose; sides of metasternum and metepisternum superficially punctate. Head. More than half as wide as pronotum (see Table 4). Mentum tooth with distinct paramedial border (Fig. 21E). Thorax. Pronotum (Fig. 21D) with sides rounded toward posterior angles (PW /PB: 1.06–1.13); maximum width in posterior third; laterobasal impressions indistinct; base moderately sinuate; anterior angles rounded, moderately projected anteriorly. Prosternum with median longitudinal sulcus distinct, deeper than in O. helopioides; prosternal process with rounded apex and nearly complete border, reduced only at sides (Fig. 21F). Metepisternum longer than wide (MA/ MM: 0.84–0.90), with lateral margin convex and coadunation with epipleuron very short, located anteriorly (Fig. 21G). Elytra. Apical sinuation weak, poorly defined. Basal margin distinct laterally, forming a small denticle at shoulder, disappearing medially at level of stria 2. Granulation in elytral marginal furrow discontinuous, separated into shorter humeral, and longer apical group (interruption located in second fourth). Parascutellar striola punctate, less impressed than other striae; striae finely punctate anteriorly; stria 7 less impressed than stria 6. Intervals 1–7 somewhat flatter than in O. helopioides, interval 8 more convex than others. Legs. Metacoxal basal sulcus highly reduced, ending at medial fifth. Male mesotibia not modified. Protarsomeres 1–3 of male (Fig. 21B) moderately dilated, with second tarsomere slightly longer than wide (W/Lp2: 0.86–0.93). Male genitalia. Median lobe (Figs 22A, B, C, D, E) with basal bulb large; angle between basal bulb and shaft nearly right; shaft long, slightly swollen compared with basal bulb; apex short, narrow; apical lamella short, bent to left, rounded at tip; ostium not reaching basal bulb. Female genitalia (see also Ortuño 1998). Basal gonocoxite with six to eight lateroapical setae arranged in line. Apical gonocoxite with single, very small dorsolateral ensiform seta and nematiform setae (Fig. 22F). Spermatheca twisted apically (Fig. 22G). Distribution. Most parts of Europe (except the northernmost regions, but including southern Sweden and the Caucasus Major), Turkey, Transcaucasia (Armenia, Azerbaijan), Israel, Iran, Turkmenistan, western Siberia (Lindroth 1992; Kryzhanovskij et al. 1995; Bousquet 2017). We record it for the first time from Israel. subgenus Lachnocrepis LeConte, 1853 [= Eulachnocrepis Habu, 1956] Type species: Oodes parallelus Say, 1830, by monotypy. Diagnosis. The species of Lachnocrepis share three derived character states: (1) ventral surface of meso- and metatarsomeres 1–4 (or 2–4) in both sexes and protarsomeres 1–4 (or 2–4) in female with long and dense fine setae aligned in two or more rows on each side of the tarsomere; (2) internal sac of median lobe without sclerite; and (3) bursa copulatrix expanded distally, two-chambered. The last two traits represent synapomorphies. The loss of the sclerite of internal sac of median lobe in Lachnocrepis is a feature not occurring in any other representative of the Oodes generic group. Expansion of bursa copulatrix consists of distal lobe folded toward main part of bursa, thus the bursa appears two-chambered. Distal lobe of bursa is more strongly developed in O. desertus than in O. japonicus; that of O. parallela Say rather resembles that of O. japonicus (cfr. Bousquet 1996: 532, fig. 130, and Fig. 26G, present work). The modification of the tarsal setation in Lachnocrepis spp. is considered homoplasy since a similar, but independently evolved condition exists also in Pseudoodes coelestinus (Fig. 6C, 23C, D, F). Geographical distribution and diversity. The subgenus includes three species, O. desertus Motschulsky from Southeast Europe, Siberia and Eastern Palaearctic, O. japonicus (Bates) from Eastern Palaearctic and northern outskirts of Oriental Region, and O. parallelus Say from eastern North America. The first two species live in sympatry in the Russian Far East, Northeast China, Korea, and Japan. 18. Oodes (Lachnocrepis) desertus Motschulsky, 1858 (Figs 23 A–F, Figs 24 A–G, Table 4) Oodes desertus Motschulsky, 1858: 173 (type locality: ‘Steppes des Kirguises’). = Oödes prolixus Bates, 1873: 254 (type locality: ‘Hiogo’), syn. n. = Oodes hahni Reitter, 1908: 186 (type locality: ‘aus Taschkend u. der Buchara’). Synonymy established by Csiki (1931: 1007). References. Oodes desertus: Motschulsky 1850: 63; Gemminger & Harold 1868: 232; Marseul 1880: 191; Chaudoir 1882: 346; Marseul 1882: 28; Semenov-Tian-Shanskij 1909: 25 (morphology); Lorenz 1998: 305; Bousquet 2003: 445; Lorenz 2005: 325; Elderkhanova 2012: 495; Bousquet 2017: 636. Lachnocrepis prolixa: Chaudoir 1882: 378; Lafer 1973: 847–849 (distribution, diagnostic features and identification key); Kim et al. 1994: 130; Bousquet 1996: 450, 467–468; Lorenz 1998: 304; Bousquet 2003: 445; Lorenz 2005: 325; Nakhibasheva et al. 2012: 305; Sundukov 2013: 190; Belousov et al. 2014: 96; Hasegawa et al. 2015: 23 (Japan, Aichi Prefecture); Bousquet 2017: 635. Oodes (Oodes) gracilis ? var. desertus: Jakobson 1906: 310. Oodes hahni: Semenov-Tian-Shanskij 1909: 26 (taxonomic notes and distribution). Lachnocrepis prolixus: Andrewes 1930: 188 (‘Japan’). Oodes (Oodes) desertus: Csiki 1931: 1007 (‘Kirgisen–steppe’); Kryzhanovskij et al. 1995: 158 (distribution in ex-USSR). Oodes (Oodes) desertus var. hahni: Csiki 1931: 1007 (‘Turkestan’); Kryzhanovskij et al. 1995: 158. Oodes (Oodes) prolixus: Csiki 1931: 1010 (‘ Japan, Ussuri, China’); Wu 1937: 148. Lachnocrepis (Eulachnocrepis) prolixa: Habu 1956: 79–80 (identification keys), 96–98 (re-description and comparisons); Habu 1958: 194 (distribution in Japan). Oodes (Lachnocrepis) prolixus: Ishkov & Kabak 1995: 85; Kryzhanovskij et al. 1995: 158 (distribution in ex-USSR). Oodes prolixus: Elderkhanova 2012: 495. Type material. Oodes desertus Motschulsky: lectotype ♀, rather damaged (see also Kelejnikova 1976: 195), with missing head and its appendages, pronotum, prothorax, fore legs, tarsomere 5 of right middle leg, tarsomeres 4–5 of left hind leg and whole right hind leg (Figs 23A, B, C, D), with labels: ‘Des. Kirg. Mer. [r, h] // Oodes desertus Motsch. Des. Kirg. M. [w, h] // Zool. Mus. Mosc. Univ. (Moscow, RUSSIA) ex coll. V.I. Motschulsky [w, p] // [red label without data]’ (ZMMU). Chaudoir (1882: 346) suggested that O. desertus may be identical to O. gracilis without having seen the type material of first taxon. This view was later followed only by Jakobson (1906) who placed the former as a questionable synonym of the latter. All other authors (see ‘References’) cited O. desertus as a separate species. No data exist for number of studied specimens in the description of O. desertus. Kelejnikova (1976) noted that the specimen kept in ZMMU is a syntype. Therefore, we followed the Recommendation 73F of the Code (ICZN 1999) and designated the available specimen as lectotype. Type material. Oodes prolixus Bates: two syntypes, labelled as follows: 1♀, ‘Hiogo [w, h] // Ex-Musaeo H.W. Bates 1892 [w, p]’ (MNHN, box ‘Collection Generale R. Oberthur H.W. Bates Dercylus... Macroproctus ’); 1♀, relatively well-preserved, labelled: ‘Hiogo [w, h] // Oodes prolixus Bates [w, h] // 59579 [w, p] // Type [r, p] // prolixus Bates * Japonia [y, h]’ (MNHUB, box nr. Oodini II). Both specimens are conspecific. The specimen in MNHN has been compared with the lectotype of O. desertus and showed that the two specimens are conspecific. Therefore, we propose the following synonymy: Oodes prolixus Bates, 1873, syn. n. of Oodes desertus Motschulsky, 1858. Type material. Oodes hahni Reitter: lectotype ♀, relatively well-preserved individual, with left maxillary palpus, right labial palpus, antennomeres 2–11 of left antenna and tarsomeres 1–5 of right hind leg missing (Figs 23E, F), with labels: ‘ Oodes Hahni m 1907. [w, h] // Turkestan Taschkend [w, p] // coll. Reitter [w, p] // Holotypus Oodes Hahni Reitter 1908. [white label with red margins, h/p]’ (HNHM). Oodes hahni was described as separate species (Reitter 1908: 186). Its status was discussed by Semenov-Tian-Shanskij (1909: 26) who concluded that O. hahni may be a subspecies or synonym of O. desertus. It has been treated as a variation (Csiki 1931; Kryzhanovskij et al. 1995) or synonym of O. desertus (Lorenz 1998, 2005; Bousquet 2003, 2017). The single type specimen was found in HNHM and borrowed for examination. Its study revealed that the specimen is conspecific with the lectotype of O. desertus Motschulsky and the syntypes of O. prolixus Bates, thus the synonymy of Oodes hahni Reitter, 1908 with O. desertus Motschulsky, 1858 is confirmed. Since Reitter (1908) did not specify the number of s
Published as part of Guéorguiev, Borislav & Liang, Hongbin, 2020, Revision of the Palaearctic and Oriental representatives of Lachnocrepis LeConte and Oodes Bonelli (Coleoptera: Carabidae), with special account on Chinese species, pp. 1-89 in Zootaxa 4850 (1) on pages 54-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4850.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4407072
{"references":["Habu, A. (1956) On the genera and species of the Oodini (Coleoptera, Carabidae) from Japan. The Bulletin of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Series C, 6, 49 - 73.","Habu, A. (1958) Additional notes on the study of the Oodini from Japan (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Kontyu, 26, 191 - 194.","Lafer, G. S. (1973) O maloizvestnykh zhuzhelitsakh (Coleoptera, Carabidae) iz Primorya i ikh zoogeograficheskaya kharakteristika. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 52, 845 - 855.","Lorenz, W. (1998) Systematic list of extant ground beetles of the world (Insecta Coleoptera \" Geadephaga \": Trachypachidae and Carabidae incl. Paussinae, Cicindelinae, Rhysodinae). 1 st Edition. Published by the Author, Tutzing, [ii] + 502 pp.","Bousquet, Y. (2003) Tribe Oodini LaFerte-Senectere, 1851. In: Lobl, L. & Smetana, A. (Eds.), Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol. 1. Archostemata-Myxophaga-Adephaga. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, pp. 444 - 445.","Lorenz, W. (2005) Systematic list of extant ground beetles of the world (Coleoptera \" Geadephaga \": Trachypachidae and Carabidae incl. Paussinae, Cicindelinae, Rhysodinae). 2 nd Edition. Published by the author, Tutzing, [ii] + 530 pp.","Bousquet, Y. (2017) Tribe Oodini LaFerte-Senectere, 1851. In: Lobl, I. & Lobl, D. (Eds.), Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol. 1. Revised and Updated Edition. Archostemata-Myxophaga-Adephaga. Brill, Leiden and Boston, pp. 635 - 636.","Lafer, G. S. (1989) 4. Semeystvo Carabidae-Zhuzhelitsy. In: Ler, P. A. (Ed.), Opredelitel nasekomykh Dalnego Vostoka SSSR. Chast 1. Zhestkokrylye, ili zhuki. Chast 1. Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 71 - 222.","Bousquet, Y. (1996) Taxonomic revision of Nearctic, Mexican, and West Indian Oodini (Coleoptera: Carabidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 128, 443 - 537. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 128443 - 3","Villa, A. & Villa, G. B. (1833) Coleopterorum species novae in catalogo dupletorum extantes. Diagnosibus, adumbrationibusatque observationibus illustratae. Coleoptera Europae dupleta in collectione Villa quae pro mutua commutatione offerri possunt, Mediolani, 1833, 32 - 36.","Villa, A. & Villa, G. B. (1868) Riproduzione delle diagnosi di coleotteri e delle osservazioni pubblicate nel catalogo dei duplicati e supplementi, coll' aggiunta di nuove annotazioni. Atti della Societa italiana di Scienze naturali, Milano, 11, 58 - 82.","Chaudoir, M. de (1837) Description de quelques genres nouveaux et de quelques especes nouvelles ou inedites de carabiques. Bulletin de la Societe Imperiale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 10 (3), 3 - 20.","Gemminger, M. & Harold, E. von (1868) Catalogus coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus. Tom. I. Cicindelidae-Carabidae. E. H. Gummi, Monachii, xxxvi + 424 + [8] pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 9089","Lambert, P. (1853) Note sur l'Oodes gracilior Fairm. Annales de la Societe Linneenne de Maine-et-Loire, 1, 199.","Chaudoir, M. de (1857) Memoire sur la famille des carabiques. 6 - e partie (Continuation). Bulletin de la Societe Imperiale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 30 (3), 1 - 64.","Motschulsky, V. de (1858) Litterature. Etudes Entomologiques, 7, 171 - 178.","Fairmaire, L. & Laboulbene, A. (1854) Livraison 1. In: Faune entomologique francaise ou description des insectes qui se trouvent en France. Coleopteres. Tome Premier. Deyrolle, Paris, pp. i-xxxv + 1 - 180.","Bedel, L. (1879) Faune des coleopteres du bassin de la Seine et de ses bassins secondaires. 1 er Sous-ordre. Carnivora. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Series 5, 9, 1 - 128. [sep. pagin.] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 8757","Bedel, L. (1880) Faune des coleopteres du bassin de la Seine et de ses bassins secondaires. 1 er Sous-ordre. Carnivora. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, (5) 10, 129 - 256. [sep. pagin.] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 8757","Marseul, S. A. de (1880) Nouveau repertoire contenant les descriptions des especes de coleopteres de l'ancien monde publiees isolement ou en langues etrangeres, en dehors des monographies ou traites speciaux et de l'Abeille. L'Abeille, Journal d'Entomologie, 19, 1 - 526.","Chaudoir, M. de (1882) Monographie des oodides 1 re partie. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Series 6, 2, 317 - 378.","Marseul, S. A. de (1882) Nouveau repertoire contenant les descriptions des especes de coleopteres de l'ancien monde publiees isolement ou en langues etrangeres, en dehors des monographies ou traites speciaux et de l'Abeille. L'Abeille, Journal d'Entomologie, 20, 1 - 196.","Ganglbauer, L. (1891 a) Die Kafer von Mitteleuropa. Die Kafer der osterreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, Deutschlands, der Schweiz, sowie des franzosischen und italienischen Alpengebietes. Erster Band. Familienreihe Caraboidea. C. Gerold's Sohn, Wien, iii + 557 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 8764","Fiori, A. (1903) Note di corologia e di caccia. Nuove indicazioni topografiche. Rivista Coleotterologica Italiana, 1, 198 - 206.","Reitter, E. (1908) Fauna Germanica. Die Kafer des Deutschen Reiches. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. I. Band. Schriften des Deutschen Lehrervereins fur Naturkunde 22. K. G. Lutz, Stuttgart, viii + 248 pp., 40 pls.","Porta, A. (1923) Fauna Coleopterorum Italica. Vol. I. Adephaga. Cicindelidae, Carabidae, Haliplidae, Hygrobiidae, Dyticidae, Gyrinidae, Rhisodidae, Paussidae. Stabilimento Tipographico Piacentino, Piacenza, 285 pp.","Burmeister, F. (1939) Biologie, Okologie und Verbreitung der europaischen Kafer, I Adephaga, Caraboidea. E. Goecke, Krefeld, 307 pp.","Jeannel, R. (1942) Coleopteres carabiques. Deuxieme Partie. In: Faune de France. 40. Librairie de la Faculte des Sciences, Paris, pp. 572 - 1173.","Focarile, A. (1959) Ricerche coleotterologiche sul litorale ionico della Puglia, Lucania e Calabria campagna 1956 - I. Notizie untroduttive Coleoptera, Carabidae. Memorie de la Societa Entomologica Italiana, Fasc. Speciale, 38, 17 - 114.","Fontolan, P. (1959) Sugli Oodes helopioides Fabr. e gracilis Villa nella Laguna di Venezia (Col. Carabidae). Bollettino della Societa Entomologica Italiana, Genova, 91, 118 - 121.","Magistretti, M. (1965) Coleoptera: Cicindelidae, Carabidae. Catalogo topografico. Fauna d'Italia. 8. Calderini, Bologna, xv + 512 pp.","Allen, R. T. (1973) Species of Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in the University of Arkansas Insect Collection. University of Arkansas (Fayetteville) Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report, 19, 1 - 46.","Ortuno, V. M. (1998) La genitalia femenina en los Oodinae (Caraboidea: Callistidae) de la region paleartica occidental. Elytron, 12, 3 - 10.","Elderkhanova, Z. M. (2012) Zhuzhelitsy (Coleoptera, Carabidae) ostrova Tyuleniy v severozapadnom Kaspii [Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the Tyuleniy Island in the northwestern Caspian Sea]. In: Materialy XIV syezda Russkogo entomologicheskogo obstchestva, Sankt-Peterburg, 27 avgusta- 1 sentyabrya 2012 [XIV Congress of the Russian Entomological Society, Saint-Petersburg, 27 August- 1 September, 2012], pp. 495. [in Russian]","Nakhibasheva, G. M., Belousov, I. A., Kabak, I. I. & Abdurakhmanov, G. M. (2012) Materialy po rasprostraneniyu nekotorykh vidov zhuzhelits (Coleoptera, Carabidae) v Dagestane [Materials on the distribution of some ground-beetle species in Dagestan (Coleoptera, Carabidae)]. In: Materialy XIV syezda Russkogo entomologicheskogo obstchestva, Sankt-Peterburg, 27 Avgusta- 1 Sentyabrya 2012 [XIV Congress of the Russian Entomological Society, Saint-Petersburg, 27 August- 1 September 1 2012], 305. [in Russian]","Belousov, I. A., Kabak, I. I., Nakhibasheva, G. M., Mukhtarova, G. M. & Rabadanov, M. (2014) Carabid beetles fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the Tshetshen island in the Caspian sea. The South of Russia: ecology, development, 9 (3), 93 - 98. [in Russian] https: // doi. org / 10.18470 / 1992 - 1098 - 2014 - 3 - 93 - 98","Ibanez Orrico, M. A. (2014) Contribucion al conocimiento de la fauna valenciana de coleopteros (E de la Peninsula Iberica). I. Coleoptera, Carabidae. Arquivos Entomoloxicos, 10, 77 - 88.","Ganglbauer, L. (1891 b) Cicindelidae, Carabidae. In: Heyden, L. von, Reitter, E. & Weise J., Catalogus Coleopterorum Europae, Caucasi et Armeniae rossicae. E. Reitter, Modling, pp. 1 - 58.","Csiki, E. (1906) Cicindelidae, Carabidae. In: Heyden, L. F. J. D. von, Reitter, E. & Weise, J., Catalogus Coleopterorum Europae, Caucasi et Armeniae Rossicae. Editio Secunda. R. Friedlander & Sohn, Modling, Berlin and E. Reitter, Caen, pp. 1 - 110.","Jakobson, G. G. (1906) Fasc. 4. In: Zhuki Rossii i Zapadnoi Evropy. A. F. Devrien, Sankt-Petersburg, pp. 241 - 320.","Csiki, E. (1931) Carabidae: Harpalinae V. In: Junk, W. & Schenkling, S. (Eds.), Coleopterorum catalogus. Pars 115. W. Junk, Berlin, pp. 739 - 1022.","Kryzhanovskij, O. L., Belousov, I. A., Kabak, I. I., Kataev, M. B., Makarov, K. V. & Shilenkov, V. G. (1995). A Checklist of the Ground-beetles of Russia and Adjacent Lands (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae). Pensoft, Sofia & Moscow, 271 pp.","Lindroth, C. H. (1943) Oodes gracilis Villa. Eine thermophile Carabide Schwedens. Notulae Entomologicae, 22, 109 - 157.","Sciaky, R. & Pavesi, M. (1986) Nuovi dati geonemici su Carabidae italiani. Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale in Milano, 127 (1 - 2), 13 - 26.","Lindroth, C. H. (1992) Ground Beetles (Carabidae) of Fenoscandia-A Zoogeographical Study. I & III. Smithsonian Institution Libraries and The National Science Foundation, Washington, 630 pp. & 814 pp. [translation by J. Adis, Erwin T. L. of Lindroth C. H. 1945. Die Fennoskandischen Carabidae. Eine tiergeographische Studie. I. Spezieller Teil. Goteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhalles Handlingar, Sjatte FoGden, Series B, 4 (1), 1 - 709]","Bates, H. W. (1873) On the geodephagous Coleoptera of Japan. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London for the year 1873, 1873, 219 - 322. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 2311.1873. tb 00643. x","Motschulsky, V. de (1850) Die Kafer Russlands. W. Gautier, Moscou, iv + xi + 91 pp.","Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, A. (1909) Analecta coleopterologica. XV. Revue Russe d'Entomologie, 9, 24 - 34.","Kim, J. I., Kwon, Y. J., Paik, J. C., Lee, S. M., An, S. R., Park, H. C. & Chu, H. Y. (1994) Order 23. Coleoptera. In: The Entomological Society of Korea and Korean Society of Applied Entomology (Eds.), Check List of Insects from Korea. Kon-Kuk University Press, Seoul, pp. 117 - 214.","Sundukov, Yu. N. (2013) Annotirovannyi katalog zhuzhelits (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) Sikhote-Alinya. [An annotated catalogue of the ground beetles (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) of Sikhote-Alin]. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, 271 pp.","Hasegawa, M., Kanie, N. & Toda, N. (2015) Oodine carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) from Aichi Prefecture, central Japan. Science Report of the Toyohashi Museum of Natural History, 25, 21 - 24. [in Japanese]","Andrewes, H. E. (1930) Catalogue of Indian insects. 18. Carabidae. Government of India Central Publication Branch, Calcutta, 389 pp.","Wu, C. F. (1937) Catalogus insectorum sinensium (Catalogue of Chinese insects). Vol. III. The Fan Memorial Institute of Biology, Peiping (Beijing), 1312 pp.","Ishkov, E. V. & Kabak, I. I. (1995) New and interesting records of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in south and southeast Kazakhstan. News of NAS of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Biological, 5, 84 - 86. [in Russian]","Kelejnikova, S. I. (1976) V. I. Motschulsky's types of Coleoptera in the collection of the Zoological Museum MGU. I. Carabidae. Sbornik trudov Zoologicheskogo muzeia MGU, 15, 183 - 224. [in Russian]","ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International Code on Zoological Nomenclature. 4 th Edition. Adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. Available from: https: // www. iczn. org / the-code / the-international-code-of-zoological-nomenclature / the-codeonline / (accessed 24 December 2019)","Bates, H. W. (1892) Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. XLIV. List of the Carabidae. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova, 32, 267 - 428.","Andrewes, H. E. (1919) On the types of Oriental Carabidae in the British Museum, and in the Hope Department of the Oxford University Museum. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London for the year 1919, 1919, 119 - 217. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 2311.1919. tb 00006. x","Fairmaire, L. (1887) Coleopteres de l'interieur de la Chine. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique, 31, 87 - 136.","Fairmaire, L. (1891) Coleopteres de l'interieur de la Chine (suite: 7 e partie). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique, 1891, clxxxvii-ccxix.","Harold, E. von (1877) Beitrage zur Kaferfauna von Japan. (Zweites Stuck) Japanische Kafer des Berliner Konigl. Museums. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 21, 337 - 367. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / mmnd. 4800210220","Heyden, L. von (1879) Die coleopterologische Ausbeute des Prof. Dr. Rein in Japan 1874 - 1875. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 23, 321 - 365. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / mmnd. 48018790221"]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: