Clinical and radiological results of a stemmed medial pivot revision implant in aseptic total knee revision arthroplasty
Autor: | M. Ricci, Tommaso Maluta, Eugenio Vecchini, Mattia Berti, Bruno Magnan, Gian Mario Micheloni |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
Reoperation musculoskeletal diseases medicine.medical_specialty Knee Joint Revision total knee arthroplasty Radiography Medial Collateral Ligament Knee Medial pivot knee Prosthesis Design Total knee 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Humans Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Arthroplasty Replacement Knee Survival analysis Aged Retrospective Studies Aged 80 and over 030222 orthopedics business.industry 030229 sport sciences Middle Aged musculoskeletal system Prosthesis Failure Surgery Radiological weapon Female Aseptic processing Implant Knee Prosthesis business |
Zdroj: | The Knee. 27:1190-1196 |
ISSN: | 0968-0160 |
Popis: | Constraint choice in revision total knee arthroplasty depends on the stability of the collateral ligaments and on the severity of bone loss, but the least degree of constraint necessary is recommended. The purpose of this retrospective matched-paired study was to compare clinical results, radiographic outcome and the survival of a stemmed medial pivot revision implant in aseptic revision TKA vs. medial pivot implant in primary TKA.Records were reviewed for 69 cases of aseptic revision TKA using Advance® Medial Pivot Stemmed Revision Knee system between 2002 and 2016. These patients were then matched in a 1:2 ratio control group of patients who received a primary TKA with Advance® Medial Pivot system. American Knee Society Score and Visual Analogue Scale pain score were recorded. Alignment, loosening, and incidence of radiolucent lines were evaluated on X-rays. Implant survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.The primary TKA group had significant superior AKSS clinical and functional score at baseline (52.3 and 68.2 points, respectively) and at last follow up (84.6 and 68.6 points) compared with the revision TKA group (47.9 and 40.9 points; 78.4 and 59.9 points; P 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the mean change from baseline to last follow up of AKSS score between the two groups (P 0.05). Radiographical outcome and implant survival were similar in the two groups (P 0.05).The authors support the use of this revision system in knees with collateral ligaments competence and mild-to-moderate bone defect. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |