Automating water quality analysis using ML and auto ML techniques
Autor: | S. Harshana, G. Prasannamedha, P. Senthil Kumar, D. Venkata Vara Prasad, K. Harrinei, Lokeswari Venkataramana, S. Jahnavi Srividya, Sravya Indraganti |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Class (computer programming)
Database Computer science computer.software_genre Biochemistry Field (computer science) Expert system Term (time) Machine Learning Pipeline transport Work (electrical) Artificial Intelligence Water Quality Humans Factory (object-oriented programming) Water quality computer Algorithms Food Analysis General Environmental Science |
Zdroj: | Environmental Research. 202:111720 |
ISSN: | 0013-9351 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111720 |
Popis: | Generation of unprocessed effluents, municipal refuse, factory wastes, junking of compostable and non-compostable effluents has hugely contaminated nature-provided water bodies like rivers, lakes and ponds. Therefore, there is a necessity to look into the water standards before the usage. This is a problem that can greatly benefit from Artificial Intelligence (AI). Traditional methods require human inspection and is time consuming. Automatic Machine Learning (AutoML) facilities supply machine learning with push of a button, or, on a minimum level, ensure to retain algorithm execution, data pipelines, and code, generally, are kept from sight and are anticipated to be the stepping stone for normalising AI. However, it is still a field under research. This work aims to recognize the areas where an AutoML system falls short or outperforms a traditional expert system built by data scientists. Keeping this as the motive, this work dives into the Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for comparing AutoML and an expert architecture built by the authors for Water Quality Assessment to evaluate the Water Quality Index, which gives the general water quality, and the Water Quality Class, a term classified on the basis of the Water Quality Index. The results prove that the accuracy of AutoML and TPOT was 1.4 % higher than conventional ML techniques for binary class water data. For Multi class water data, AutoML was 0.5 % higher and TPOT was 0.6% higher than conventional ML techniques. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |