GRADE : An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations

Autor:	Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A, Vist, G. E., Kunz, R, Falck Ytter, Y, Alonso Coello, P, Schunemann, H. J., Liberati, Alessandro, Grade Working Group
Přispěvatelé:	Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5. guyatt@mcmaster.ca
Jazyk:	angličtina
Rok vydání:	2008
Předmět:	medicine.medical_specialty Consensus media_common.quotation_subject Decision Making Alternative medicine MEDLINE Health care medicine Quality (business) media_common Quality Indicators Health Care Medical education VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Helsetjeneste- og helseadministrasjonsforskning: 806 Evidence-Based Medicine practice guidelines VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin sosialmedisin: 801 business.industry Grade system Quality research General Medicine Evidence-based medicine recommendations Quality of evidence Practice Guidelines as Topic business Analysis
Zdroj:	BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Popis:	Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ccd11469367a0a4ee223bb73fc583f4a https://hdl.handle.net/11380/625043 Zobrazit plný text záznamu