Results from an Audit Feedback Strategy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease In-Hospital Care: A Joint Analysis from the AUDIPOC and European COPD Audit Studies
| Autor: | M. Isabel Asensio-Cruz, Carmen Calero, Ady Castro-Acosta, Francisco Pozo-Rodríguez, José Luis López-Campos |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Spirometry medicine.medical_specialty Pulmonology Copd patients Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease lcsh:Medicine Pulmonary disease Audit Joint analysis Pulmonary Disease Chronic Obstructive Health care Medicine and Health Sciences medicine Humans Hospital Mortality Health Care Quality lcsh:Science Intensive care medicine Quality of Health Care Medical Audit COPD Multidisciplinary medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry lcsh:R medicine.disease Hospital care Health Care Hospitalization Spain lcsh:Q Female Patient Care business Research Article |
| Zdroj: | PLoS ONE PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 10, p e110394 (2014) |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
| Popis: | Background Clinical audits have emerged as a potential tool to summarize the clinical performance of healthcare over a specified period of time. However, the effectiveness of audit and feedback has shown inconsistent results and the impact of audit and feedback on clinical performance has not been evaluated for COPD exacerbations. In the present study, we analyzed the results of two consecutive nationwide clinical audits performed in Spain to evaluate both the in-hospital clinical care provided and the feedback strategy. Methods The present study is an analysis of two clinical audits performed in Spain that evaluated the clinical care provided to COPD patients who were admitted to the hospital for a COPD exacerbation. The first audit was performed from November–December 2008. The feedback strategy consisted of personalized reports for each participant center, the presentation and discussion of the results at regional, national and international meetings and the creation of health-care quality standards for COPD. The second audit was part of a European study during January and February 2011. The impact of the feedback strategy was evaluated in term of clinical care provided and in-hospital survival. Results A total of 94 centers participated in the two audits, recruiting 8,143 admissions (audit 1∶3,493 and audit 2∶4,650). The initially provided clinical care was reasonably acceptable even though there was considerable variability. Several diagnostic and therapeutic procedures improved in the second audit. Although the differences were significant, the degree of improvement was small to moderate. We found no impact on in-hospital mortality. Conclusions The present study describes COPD hospital care in Spanish hospitals and evaluates the impact of peer-benchmarked, individually written and group-oral feedback strategy on the clinical outcomes for treating COPD exacerbations. It describes small to moderate improvements in the clinical care provided to COPD patients with no impact on in-hospital mortality. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|