Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review
| Autor: | Daniëlle A W M van der Windt, Bart W. Koes, Arianne P. Verhagen, Sarita van Geest, Marloes Thoomes-de Graaf, Erik Thoomes, Carmen L.A. Vleggeert-Lankamp, Deborah Falla, Barbara Kuijper, Wendy Scholten-Peeters |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | General Practice |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
MEDLINE Diagnostic accuracy Physical examination CINAHL Review Sensitivity and Specificity 03 medical and health sciences Cervical radiculopathy 0302 clinical medicine SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being Shoulder physical examination Spurling Medical imaging medicine Journal Article Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Medical history Radiculopathy Neurologic Examination 030222 orthopedics medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Arm squeeze test Confidence interval Neurodynamic testing Orthopedics Physical therapy Cervical Vertebrae Surgery Neurology (clinical) business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Thoomes, E J, van Geest, S, van der Windt, D A, Falla, D, Verhagen, A P, Koes, B W, Thoomes-de Graaf, M, Kuijper, B, Scholten-Peeters, W G & Vleggeert-Lankamp, C L 2018, ' Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy : a systematic review ', The Spine Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 179-189 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.241 The Spine Journal, 18(1), 179-189. Elsevier Inc. The Spine Journal, 18(1), 179-189 |
| ISSN: | 1529-9430 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.241 |
| Popis: | Background Context In clinical practice, the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy is based on information from the patient's history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. Various physical tests may be performed, but their diagnostic accuracy is unknown. Purpose This study aimed to summarize and update the evidence on diagnostic performance of tests carried out during a physical examination for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Study Design A review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests was carried out. Study Sample The study sample comprised diagnostic studies comparing results of tests performed during a physical examination in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy with a reference standard of imaging or surgical findings. Outcome Measures Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios are presented, together with pooled results for sensitivity and specificity. Methods A literature search up to March 2016 was performed in CENTRAL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2. Results Five diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. Only Spurling's test was evaluated in more than one study, showing high specificity ranging from 0.89 to 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59–1.00); sensitivity varied from 0.38 to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.21–0.99). No studies were found that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of widely used neurological tests such as key muscle strength, tendon reflexes, and sensory impairments. Conclusions There is limited evidence for accuracy of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. When consistent with patient history, clinicians may use a combination of Spurling's, axial traction, and an Arm Squeeze test to increase the likelihood of a cervical radiculopathy, whereas a combined results of four negative neurodynamics tests and an Arm Squeeze test could be used to rule out the disorder. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect