Quality of web-based information for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
| Autor: | L. Dear, Jennifer Pearson, A. Barrow, Shea Palmer, J. Brotherton, Sandy Thomas, S. Guy |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Chronic condition media_common.quotation_subject Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Patient Education as Topic Risk Factors Excellence Osteoarthritis Health care medicine Humans Quality (business) 030212 general & internal medicine media_common Internet Consumer Health Information business.industry Self-Management Information quality United Kingdom Cross-Sectional Studies Family medicine Chronic Disease Quality Score The Internet business Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Patient education |
| Zdroj: | Physiotherapy. 104:318-326 |
| ISSN: | 0031-9406 |
| Popis: | Background Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition that affects over 8.75 million people in the UK. Approximately 43% of people in the UK search for health and medical information online. However, health information on the internet is of variable quality. Research into the quality of online OA information is dated and there is a need to evaluate the existing information. Objectives To assess the quality of websites which provide educational information for patients with OA. Design Electronic cross-sectional survey. Methods The search term ‘osteoarthritis’ was entered into the five popular UK-based search engines in order to identify 50 unique websites. These websites were appraised by two assessors using criteria developed from the available literature and recent guidelines of the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. The appraisal considered the general quality of the website and OA-specific content. Results Most of the websites evaluated (34/50, 68%) scored more than half of the maximum available quality score (max score 59). The median total score was 41. For general quality of the website, the median score was nine (range three to 16, out of 16), and for OA-specific content, the median score was 31 (range two to 43, out of 43). Websites of higher quality were created more recently, disclosed sources of information, had external seals of approval and directed the reader on to other relevant websites. Conclusions The internet is a potentially useful tool for educating and empowering healthcare consumers. The websites evaluated were generally of a ‘high’ standard; however, there was wide variation in the quality of information. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect