The effectiveness of intradiscal biologic treatments for discogenic low back pain: a systematic review
Autor: | Zachary L McCormick, Wenchun Qu, Belinda Duszynski, Timothy P. Maus, Christine L. Hunt, Yakov Vorobeychik, Byron J Schneider, Jianguo Cheng, Aaron Conger |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Provocation test Context (language use) Discography law.invention Patient satisfaction Randomized controlled trial law Internal medicine Back pain medicine Humans Pain Management Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Analgesics Biological Products Platelet-Rich Plasma business.industry Low back pain Confidence interval Treatment Outcome Surgery Neurology (clinical) medicine.symptom business Low Back Pain Intervertebral Disc Displacement |
Zdroj: | The Spine Journal. 22:226-237 |
ISSN: | 1529-9430 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.015 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND CONTEXT There are limited treatments for discogenic low back pain. Intradiscal injections of biologic agents such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or stem cells (SC) are theorized to have regenerative properties and have gained increasing interest as a possible treatment, but the evidence supporting their use in clinical practice is not yet well-defined. PURPOSE Determine the effectiveness of intradiscal biologics for treating discogenic low back pain. STUDY DESIGN PRISMA-compliant systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with discogenic low back pain confirmed by provocation discography or clinical and imaging findings consistent with discogenic pain. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with ≥50% pain relief after intradiscal biologic injection at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included ≥2-point pain score reduction on NRS; patient satisfaction; functional improvement; decreased use of other health care, including analgesics and surgery; and structural disc changes on MRI. METHODS Comprehensive literature search performed in 2018 and updated in 2020. Interventions included were biologic therapies including mesenchymal stem cells, platelet rich plasma, microfragmented fat, amniotic membrane-based injectates, and autologous conditioned serum. Any other treatment (sham or active) was considered for comparative studies. Studies were independently reviewed. RESULTS The literature search yielded 3,063 results, 37 studies were identified for full-text review, and 12 met established inclusion criteria for review. The quality of evidence on effectiveness of intradiscal biologics was very low. A single randomized controlled trial evaluating platelet-rich plasma reported positive outcomes but had significant methodological flaws. A single trial that evaluated mesenchymal stem cells was negative. Success rates for platelet-rich plasma injectate in aggregate were 54.8% (95% Confidence Interval: 40%–70%). For mesenchymal stem cells, the aggregate success rate at six months was 53.5% (95% Confidence Interval: 38.6%–68.4%), though using worst-case analysis this decreased to 40.7% (95% Confidence Interval: 28.1%–53.2%). Similarly, ≥30% functional improvement was achieved in 74.3% (95% Confidence Interval: 59.8%–88.7%) at six months but using worst-case analysis, this decreased to 44.1% (95% Confidence Interval: 28.1%–53.2%). CONCLUSION Limited observational data support the use of intradiscal biologic agents for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. According to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation System, the evidence supporting use of intradiscal mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma is very low quality. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |