Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Amputation Body Image Scale (ABIS®) and its shortened version (ABIS-R®)for French speaking patients with lower limb amputation
| Autor: | Y. Arlettaz, M. Assal, Noël Martinet, Philippe Vuistiner, François Luthi, L. Huchon, Isabelle Loiret, Olivier Borens, Aurélie Vouilloz, Jean Paysant |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Psychometrics Intraclass correlation medicine.medical_treatment Rehabilitation Body Image Scale Construct validity urologic and male genital diseases body regions Amputation Cronbach's alpha Lower limb amputation Body image scale cardiovascular system Physical therapy medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine cardiovascular diseases Brief Pain Inventory French cross-cultural adaptation Psychology human activities |
| Zdroj: | Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 58:e126-e127 |
| ISSN: | 1877-0657 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.07.303 |
| Popis: | Aim The Amputation Body Image Scale (ABIS®) and its shortened version (ABIS-R®) are self-administered questionnaires addressing the patient's perspective, only available in English [1] and Turkish. The aim of this study was the French cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the ABIS (ABIS-F) and its shortened version ABIS-R (ABIS-R-F). Psychometrics properties: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity. Method One hundred and twenty-nine patients (23% women), with a mean age of 62 years, with lower limb amputation for at least 1 year (vascular 75%, traumatic 25%) were recruited in 5 clinical centers. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation (ABIS 20 items; ratings of 1-5; high score indicating high body disturbance, and ABIS-R 14 items, ratings of 0–2) were made according to international guidelines. Internal consistency was calculated by the coefficient of Cronbach. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation in a subgroup who completed the ABIS on 2 occasions with an interval of 5 to 7 days. Construct validity was estimated through correlations with SF-36 mental component summary (MCS) and SF-36 physical component summary (PCS). Correlations with some scales of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): pain severity, highest pain and pain interference with activities. Results High internal consistency (ABIS-F: α = 0.91, ABIS-R-F: α = 0.90). Test-retest reliability (24 patients) was good: ABIS-F 0.87 [95% CI 0.69–0.95] and for ABIS-R at 0.86 [95% CI 0.66–0.94]. Correlations with SF-36 were negative: ABIS-F/SF-36 CM: –0.40 [–0.54 to –0.21], ABIS-R-F/SF-36 CM: –0.42 [–0.56 to –0.24]; ABIS-F/SF-36 CP: –0.40 [–0.54 to –0.21], ABIS-R-F/SF-36 CP: –0.44 [–0.58 to –0.26]. Correlations with pain were positive for both ABIS questionnaires: respectively for ABIS-F and for ABIS-R-F: pain severity, 0.39 [0.20–0.54] and 0.38 [0.19–0.53]: highest pain, 0.39 [0.20–0.54] and 0.39 [0.20–0.54]: interference with activities, 0.53 [0.36–0.65] for both. No floor or ceiling effects. Discussion/conclusion The ABIS-F and the ABIS-R-F have the same good psychometric properties as the original ABIS® and ABIS-R®. They could be applied with confidence in patients with lower limb amputation. The ABIS-R-F (the shortened version) is as reliable as the ABIS-F (the longer version). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect