Ultrasound guided central line insertion in neonates: Pain score results from a prospective study
| Autor: | Dany Al Hamod, Ayah Al Bizri, Rami Sabouneh, Sally El Helou, Smart Zeidan, Pierre Akiki |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Catheterization Central Venous Time Factors Pain Procedural Single Center Peripherally inserted central catheter law.invention Randomized controlled trial law Intensive Care Units Neonatal Catheterization Peripheral Medicine Humans Prospective cohort study Internal jugular vein Ultrasonography Interventional Pain Measurement Central line Respiratory Distress Syndrome Newborn business.industry Infant Newborn Infant Low Birth Weight Anti-Bacterial Agents Catheter Parenteral nutrition Anesthesia Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Female Parenteral Nutrition Total Neonatal Sepsis business Infant Premature |
| Zdroj: | Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine. 13(1) |
| ISSN: | 1878-4429 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND Central lines can be placed through different techniques, either peripherally or centrally. Although they have the same aim, decision to use one of these modalities depends on the patient outcomes. The aim is to compare pain scores between ultrasound-guided central line insertion and peripherally inserted catheter in neonates in a prospective randomized single center study. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted in neonates requiring central venous access for any of the following reasons: total parenteral nutrition (TPN), antibiotics treatment for at least 7 days and having poor or difficult venous access. The study compared pain difference, in neonates, that were randomized between peripherally and ultra-sound guided centrally placed central lines using the validated pain score N - PASS. RESULTS 61 neonates were enrolled in the study. US-guided CICC was associated with less pain as reported by the statistically significant lower pain score difference (p-value |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|