A Randomized Controlled Trial of Novel Loop Drainage Technique Versus Standard Incision and Drainage in the Treatment of Skin Abscesses
Autor: | Natali Lilburn, Michelle Wan, Jay Ladde, Sara Baker, Linda Papa |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Skin Diseases law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Patient satisfaction Randomized controlled trial law Loop group Incision and drainage medicine Humans Subcutaneous abscess Prospective Studies Child Abscess business.industry 030208 emergency & critical care medicine General Medicine Reference Standards medicine.disease Surgery Loop (topology) Cellulitis Emergency Medicine Drainage business |
Zdroj: | Academic Emergency Medicine. 27:1229-1240 |
ISSN: | 1553-2712 1069-6563 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acem.14106 |
Popis: | The objective was to compare the failure rate of incision and drainage (ID) with LOOP technique versus ID with standard packing technique in adults and children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with subcutaneous abscess.This prospective, randomized controlled trial (NCT03398746) enrolled a convenience sample of patients presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12 months with skin abscesses. Of 256 patients screened, 217 patients were enrolled, 109 randomized to ID with packing (50%) and 108 (50%) to ID with LOOP. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined by admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up. The secondary outcomes included ease of procedure, ease of care, pain, and satisfaction using a 10-point numeric rating scale.There were no differences in patient characteristics between groups. Follow-up data were available in 196 (90%). Treatment failure occurred in 20% (range = 12%-28%) of packing patients and 13% (range = 6%-20%) of LOOP patients (p = 0.25). There were no significant differences in failure rates in adults (p = 0.82), but there was a significant difference in children (age ≤ 18 years) at 21% (range = 8%-34%) in the packing group and 0 (0%) in the LOOP group (p = 0.002). Operators reported no significant differences in ease of procedure between techniques (p = 0.221). There was significantly less pain at follow-up in the LOOP group versus packing (p = 0.004). The wound was much easier to care for over the first 36 hours in the LOOP group (p = 0.002). Patient satisfaction at 10 days postprocedure was significantly higher in the LOOP group (p = 0.005).The LOOP and packing techniques had similar failure rates for treatment of subcutaneous abscesses in adults, but the LOOP technique had significantly fewer failures in children. Overall, pain and patient satisfaction were significantly better in patients treated using the LOOP technique. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |