The Prehospital Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is Its Full Potential Being Realized? fn1fn1The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 is supported by Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| Autor: | W. Douglas Weaver, William J. Rogers, John G. Canto, Douglas J. Pearce, Laura J. Bowlby, William J. French |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1997 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Infarction medicine.disease Reperfusion therapy Angioplasty Internal medicine Cardiology Medicine cardiovascular diseases National registry Myocardial infarction diagnosis Myocardial infarction Symptom onset Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Electrocardiography |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 29:498-505 |
| ISSN: | 0735-1097 |
| Popis: | Objectives. This study sought to examine the management and subsequent outcomes of patients with a prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG) in a large, voluntary registry of myocardial infarction.Background. The prehospital ECG has been proposed as a means of rapidly identifying patients with acute myocardial infarction who might be eligible for reperfusion therapy.Methods. The characteristics and outcomes of patients with a prehospital ECG were compared with those without a prehospital ECG in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 data base. Included in the analysis were those patients who presented to the hospital within 12 h of an acute myocardial infarction. Excluded were patients with an in-hospital infarction, transferred-in referrals and self-transported patients.Results. Prehospital ECGs were obtained in 3,768 (5%) of 66,995 National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 patients meeting study criteria. Median time from myocardial infarction symptom onset until hospital arrival was longer among those having a prehospital ECG (152 vs. 91 min, p < 0.001). However, once in the hospital, the prehospital ECG group experienced a shorter median time to the initiation of either thrombolysis (30 vs. 40 min, p < 0.001) or primary angioplasty (92 vs. 115 min, p < 0.001). The prehospital ECG group was more likely to receive thrombolytic therapy (43% vs. 37%, p < 0.001) and to undergo primary angioplasty (11% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Also, the prehospital ECG group was more likely to undergo coronary arteriography (55% vs. 40%, p < 0.001), angioplasty (24% vs. 16%, p < 0.001) or bypass surgery (10% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was 8% in patients with a prehospital ECG and 12% in those without a prehospital ECG (p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline covariates utilizing multiple logistic regression analysis, this mortality difference remained statistically significant (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.96, p = 0.01).Conclusions. The prehospital ECG is infrequently utilized for diagnosing myocardial infarction, and among patients with a prehospital ECG, is associated with a longer time from symptom onset to hospital arrival. Despite these shortcomings, the prehospital ECG is a test that may potentially influence the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction through wider, faster in-hospital utilization of reperfusion strategies and greater usage of invasive procedures, factors that may possibly reduce short-term mortality. Efforts to implement the prehospital ECG more widely and more rapidly may be indicated.(J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:498–505) |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|