The rise and fall of job insecurity during a pandemic: The role of habitual coping

Autor: Elissa El Khawli, Anita C. Keller, Maximilian Agostini, Ben Gützkow, Jannis Kreienkamp, N. Pontus Leander, Susanne Scheibe
Přispěvatelé: Organizational Psychology, Social Psychology, Developmental Psychology
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Vocational Behavior, 139
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 139:103792. ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
ISSN: 0001-8791
Popis: Contains fulltext : 250484.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Crises like the COVID-19 pandemic can trigger concerns about loss of employment and changes in work conditions, and thereby increase job insecurity. Yet, little is known about how perceived job insecurity subsequently unfolds over time and how individual differences in habitual coping moderate such a trajectory. Using longitudinal data from 899 US-based participants across 5 waves (March to June 2020), we investigated the trajectory of job insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic and how this trajectory depended on habitual coping strategies such as planning, reappraisal, and distraction. Results from latent growth curve analysis indicated that, on average, job insecurity initially increased and then decreased after signing of the coronavirus stimulus bill, suggesting a pattern of shock followed by adjustment. During the shock phase, habitual use of distraction was related to less increases in job insecurity. Later during the adjustment phase, decreases in job insecurity were more pronounced for individuals with higher habitual use of planning, but were not affected by reappraisal or distraction. Hence, different coping strategies appear beneficial in different phases of adjustment, and the beneficial effect of planning may take time to manifest. Altogether, our study highlights how in the context of extraordinary and uncontrollable events, coping strategies can impact the trajectory of a stressor. 13 p.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: