Gender Disparity in Radiology Society Committees and Leadership in North America and Comparison With Other Continents
| Autor: | Hani H. Abujudeh, Ismail T. Ali, Sabeena Jalal, Jenny Bencardino, Pina C. Sanelli, Samad Shah, Alexander Norbash, Savvas Nicolaou, Mai-Lan Ho, Kiran K. Maddu, Faisal Khosa, Castillo Mauricio, Parthiv Amin |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Demographics education Scopus 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Gender disparity Societies Medical business.industry Gender distribution Test (assessment) Leadership Institutional affiliation Bibliometrics 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis North America Professional association Female Radiology business Male predominance |
| Zdroj: | Current problems in diagnostic radiology. 50(6) |
| ISSN: | 1535-6302 |
| Popis: | To evaluate gender distribution in radiology professional society leadership positions. Our study intends to assess and compare the gender distribution among leadership roles and professional society committee memberships of the radiology societies and seek an understanding of potential associations between gender, academic research metrics, institutional academic rank, and leadership roles.We identified radiology professional society committee members to assess relative gender composition in 28 radiology societies in North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand. The research metrics were obtained from the SCOPUS database and demographics and institutional affiliation through institutional websites' internet searches. Gender distribution by academic ranks and other discontinuous variables were analyzed using the Chi-Square test. Wallis tests.Of the 3011 members of society committees, 67.9% were male, and 32.1% female. Among all the society members, the data showed that the proportion of committee members holding leadership positions was comparable between males (25.7%) and females (22.5%). However, when we did a subgroup analysis and disaggregated the data by leadership positions, we noted that among those who held the leadership positions, the proportion of males was more significant (n = 526, 70.7%) compared to females (n = 218, 29.3%). Overall, males had higher median publications, citations, H-indices, and active years of research (P0.0001). At all university academic ranks, men outnumbered females (P = 0.0015, Chi-square 15.38), with the most considerable disparity at the rank of professor (71.9% male, 28.1% female, P = 0.0003).There was male predominance amongst committee members in radiology societies. Our study found no significant differences between those in leadership positions, suggesting that once a member of a committee, females are equally likely as males to attain leadership positions. Analysis of committee members' academic rank and committee leaders demonstrated underrepresentation of females at higher academic ranks, and males overall had higher research metrics than females. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect