Accuracy of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for Classifying Pediatric Eyes as Papilledema Versus Pseudopapilledema

Autor: Stacy L. Pineles, Laura Bonelli, Joseph L. Demer, Anthony C. Arnold, Peter A. Quiros, Melinda Y. Chang, Federico G. Velez, Alfredo A. Sadun
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Diagnostic Imaging
Male
Retinal Ganglion Cells
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
genetic structures
Nerve fiber layer
Diagnostic Techniques
Ophthalmological

Multimodal Imaging
03 medical and health sciences
Nerve Fibers
0302 clinical medicine
Optical coherence tomography
Ophthalmology
Optic Nerve Diseases
Photography
medicine
Medical imaging
Humans
Prospective Studies
Fluorescein Angiography
Child
Papilledema
Ultrasonography
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Optical Imaging
Fundus photography
Reproducibility of Results
Eye Diseases
Hereditary

medicine.disease
Fluorescein angiography
Optic disc drusen
eye diseases
Surgery
medicine.anatomical_structure
Child
Preschool

030221 ophthalmology & optometry
Optic nerve
Female
sense organs
medicine.symptom
business
Tomography
Optical Coherence

030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Zdroj: Ophthalmology. 124:1839-1848
ISSN: 0161-6420
Popis: Purpose To identify the most accurate diagnostic imaging modality for classifying pediatric eyes as papilledema (PE) or pseudopapilledema (PPE). Design Prospective observational study. Subjects Nineteen children between the ages of 5 and 18 years were recruited. Five children (10 eyes) with PE, 11 children (19 eyes) with PPE owing to suspected buried optic disc drusen (ODD), and 3 children (6 eyes) with PPE owing to superficial ODD were included. Methods All subjects underwent imaging with B-scan ultrasonography, fundus photography, autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography (FA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and volumetric OCT scans through the optic nerve head with standard spectral-domain (SD OCT) and enhanced depth imaging (EDI OCT) settings. Images were read by 3 masked neuro-ophthalmologists, and the final image interpretation was based on 2 of 3 reads. Image interpretations were compared with clinical diagnosis to calculate accuracy and misinterpretation rates of each imaging modality. Main Outcome Measures Accuracy of each imaging technique for classifying eyes as PE or PPE, and misinterpretation rates of each imaging modality for PE and PPE. Results Fluorescein angiography had the highest accuracy (97%, 34 of 35 eyes, 95% confidence interval 92%–100%) for classifying an eye as PE or PPE. FA of eyes with PE showed leakage of the optic nerve, whereas eyes with suspected buried ODD demonstrated no hyperfluorescence, and eyes with superficial ODD showed nodular staining. Other modalities had substantial likelihood (30%–70%) of misinterpretation of PE as PPE. Conclusions The best imaging technique for correctly classifying pediatric eyes as PPE or PE is FA. Other imaging modalities, if used in isolation, are more likely to lead to misinterpretation of PE as PPE, which could potentially result in failure to identify a life-threatening disorder causing elevated intracranial pressure and papilledema.
Databáze: OpenAIRE