A randomized controlled trial of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β2 agonist fixed-dose combinations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Autor: | Yuji Tohda, Hirochiyo Sawaguchi, Soichiro Hanada, Masato Muraki, Yuki Kunita, Ken Shirahase, Ryo Yamazaki |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Male
Quinuclidines Tiotropium/olodaterol law.invention Pulmonary Disease Chronic Obstructive chemistry.chemical_compound 0302 clinical medicine Japan Randomized controlled trial law Forced Expiratory Volume Respiratory function Prospective Studies 030212 general & internal medicine Aged 80 and over Inhaler device Umeclidinium/vilanterol COPD Cross-Over Studies Olodaterol Middle Aged Drug Combinations Treatment Outcome Disease Progression Female Vilanterol Research Article medicine.drug Quality of life Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine medicine.medical_specialty Muscarinic Antagonists Drug Administration Schedule 03 medical and health sciences Internal medicine medicine Humans Tiotropium Bromide Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists Aged lcsh:RC705-779 Glycopyrronium/indacaterol business.industry Nebulizers and Vaporizers lcsh:Diseases of the respiratory system medicine.disease Crossover study Benzoxazines Clinical trial 030228 respiratory system chemistry Indacaterol business |
Zdroj: | BMC Pulmonary Medicine, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) BMC Pulmonary Medicine |
ISSN: | 1471-2466 |
Popis: | Background In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, combination treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) increases forced expiratory volume in one second and reduces symptoms compared to monotherapy. In Japan, three different once-daily fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) have been prescribed since 2015, although a direct comparison of these FDCs has never been performed. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness, preference, and safety of three LAMA/LABA FDCs—glycopyrronium/indacaterol (Gly/Ind), umeclidinium/vilanterol (Ume/Vil), and tiotropium/olodaterol (Tio/Olo)—in patients with COPD. Methods We enrolled 75 COPD outpatients (male:female ratio, 69:6; 77.4 ± 6.9 years). A prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted on three groups using three FDCs: Gly/Ind; Ume/Vil; and Tio/Olo. Each medication was administered for 4 weeks before crossover (total 12 weeks). After each FDC administration, a respiratory function test and questionnaire survey were conducted. A comparative questionnaire survey of all three LAMA/LABA FDCs was conducted after 12 weeks (following administration of final FDC). Results No significant differences in COPD Assessment Test or modified Medical Research Council dyspnea questionnaire were reported in the surveys completed after each FDC administration; no significant differences in spirometric items were observed. In the final comparative questionnaire survey, patients reported better actual feeling of being able to inhale following Gly/Ind administration compared with Tio/Olo, although no significant differences in adverse events or other evaluations were reported. Conclusions The three LAMA/LABA FDCs administered to COPD patients show similar effects and safety, although some minor individual preference was reported. Trial registration This study retrospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (number UMIN000041342, registered on August 6, 2020). |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |