Comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus and continuous epidural infusion for post-operative analgesia after major abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial
Autor: | Mark Latronica, Matthias Behrends, Alec Peniche, Claas Siegmueller, Pedram Aleshi, Michael Ladd, Po-Yi Paul Su, Adrian Delgado, Ramana K. Naidu, Lee-lynn Chen, Elle Clelland |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Local anesthetic
medicine.drug_class Ropivacaine business.industry Fentanyl law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Patient satisfaction Bolus (medicine) Randomized controlled trial 030202 anesthesiology Interquartile range law Anesthesia medicine 030212 general & internal medicine business medicine.drug Abdominal surgery |
Zdroj: | Journal of clinical anesthesia. 64 |
ISSN: | 1873-4529 |
Popis: | Study objective Few studies have compared continuous epidural infusion (CEI) against programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery. It has not been established whether the modality of epidural medication administration affects postoperative pain and other patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of PIEB against CEI in postoperative pain management after a broad range of surgeries with abdominal incisions, all managed in the context of an established enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Design Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting Postoperative acute care. Patients 120 patients scheduled for major surgery involving abdominal incisions with planned postoperative epidural analgesia were enrolled as study participants. Interventions All subjects received a standardized epidural solution containing ropivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 2 μg/ml. The CEI group received this solution as a continuous infusion, while the PIEB group received this solution as programmed intermittent boluses. Measurements The primary study outcome was the total local anesthetic used over the first 24 h post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included pain severity, pain interference, total opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Main results There was no difference in the primary outcome of total amount of local anesthetic administered in the first 24-hour postoperative period (PIEB: 123 mg [Interquartile Range (IQR): 114–136]; CEI: 126 mg [IQR: 120–134]). There were also no differences in average pain severity, total opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, number of PCEA requests and incidence of adverse events at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Conclusions Our study suggests that within the context of an established ERAS program, PIEB and CEI modes of epidural analgesia can be equally efficacious and safe in providing postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |