The spiralling of the securitisation of migration in the EU: from the management of a ‘crisis’ to a governance of human mobility?
Autor: | Valeria Bello |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Universitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Comunicació i Relacions Internacionals Blanquerna |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Estat
Corporate governance 05 social sciences 0507 social and economic geography Linear process Actors no estatals (Relacions internacionals) 0506 political science Seguretat pública Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Political economy Political science Phenomenon Migració de pobles 050602 political science & public administration 316 - Sociologia. Comunicació Narrative 050703 geography Demography |
Zdroj: | RECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya) Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname Recercat: Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
ISSN: | 1469-9451 1369-183X |
DOI: | 10.1080/1369183x.2020.1851464 |
Popis: | This special issue illustrates that the securitisation of migration is not a linear process but a spiralling phenomenon, which involves different actors, and their policies, practices and narratives, in a spiralling progression that both self-fulfils and reinforces migration-security nexus’ dynamics. By proposing a cognitive ontology to understand the social construction of migration as a security threat, the introduction to this special issue proposes a categorisation of cognitions, mandates, constituencies and interests of state and non-state actors. Through a dichotomisation of these categories, it is possible to clarify how and why they either socially construct or deconstruct migration as a threat. In particular, the special issue identifies in prejudicial cognitions one of the main reasons for which a variety of actors enact practices and produce narratives that contribute to both securitising migration and reinforcing its nexus with crime, and the consequent social construction of ‘migration crises’. The different contributions to this special issue prove the arguments here exposed with a different analysis of how migration has been dealt with at either governmental or non-governmental levels. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |