The Hettner-Hartshorne connection: reconsidering the process of reception and transformation of a geographic concept
Autor: | harvey, Francis, Wardenga, Ute |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 1998 |
Předmět: |
Landerkunde
Structure (mathematical logic) idiographic Process (engineering) Hartshorne Geography Planning and Development Allgemeine Geographie language.human_language Connection (mathematics) Epistemology Hettner German Meaning (philosophy of language) Hartshorne-Schaefer debate Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) language Geography. Anthropology. Recreation Sociology nomothesis |
Zdroj: | Finisterra-Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, Vol 33, Iss 65 (1998) Finisterra; Vol. 33 Núm. 65 (1998) Finisterra; Vol. 33 N.º 65 (1998) Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instacron:RCAAP Finisterra-Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, Vol XXXIII, Iss 65, Pp 131-140 (1998) Finisterra; vol. 33 n.º 65 (1998) |
ISSN: | 2182-2905 0430-5027 |
Popis: | This contribution examines the process of reception and transformation of a geographic concept on the exemple of the connection between Alfred Hettner and Richard Hartshorne. The first part sketches the development and structure of Hettner's theoretical construction of geography. This examiation shows that commonly held perceptions until now are the results of a reception that only partially, and in parts erroneously, represent Hettner's thinking. The second part illustrates how Richard Hartshorne received Hettner's concept. Hartshorne, like Hettner's German colleagues, did not grasp the underlying meaning of Hettner's work. However, in contrast to many German geographers, he did understand important aspects of Hettner's approach, like, for exemple, the relational approach to the "region", the problem of regionalization,and the relationship between idiography and nomothesis. The third part shows how German geographers' understanding of Hettner's concept was influenced by the Hartshorne-Schaefer debate in the 1970s. Finisterra, vol. 33 n.º 65 (1998) |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |