Impact of pioglitazone on coronary endothelial function in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease
Autor: | Hans A. Kestler, Wolfgang Koenig, Jochen Wöhrle, Martin Höher, Thorsten Nusser, Vinzenz Hombach, Nikolaus Marx |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2008 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Coronary Artery Disease Placebo Diabetes Complications Coronary artery disease Double-Blind Method Internal medicine Clinical endpoint medicine Humans Hypoglycemic Agents Endothelial dysfunction Glycemic Pioglitazone business.industry Cold pressor test General Medicine Middle Aged Placebo Effect medicine.disease Adenosine Treatment Outcome Cardiology Female Thiazolidinediones Endothelium Vascular Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Clinical Research in Cardiology. 97:726-733 |
ISSN: | 1861-0692 1861-0684 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00392-008-0663-8 |
Popis: | Pioglitazone has been shown to exert multiple antiatherosclerotic actions independent from its glycemic effects. We studied the hypothesis that pioglitazone improves coronary endothelial dysfunction in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.Fifty non-diabetic patients with CAD were randomized to 6 months treatment with pioglitazone 30 mg daily or placebo. Coronary endothelial function was tested at baseline and after 6 months with intracoronary infusion of adenosine, acetylcholine (0.072; 0.72; 7.2, and 36 microg/min), glyceroltrinitrate, and cold pressor test (CPT). The primary endpoint was the mean effect of treatment compared with placebo on acetylcholine-induced coronary vascular response for all acetylcholine dosages, based on percent change in luminal area measured by quantitative coronary angiography.There was no difference in baseline coronary endothelial function. The primary endpoint was significantly different between the groups with a 1.8% +/- 2.0% increase in luminal area between baseline and follow-up with pioglitazone and a 7.6% +/- 2.4% decrease in the placebo group (P0.008). At follow-up, there was a trend for a difference in CPT (P = 0.057). No difference was observed regarding intracoronary glyceroltrinitrate or adenosine.Pioglitazone treatment in non-diabetic patients with CAD was associated with a significantly better coronary endothelial function compared to placebo. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |