Randomized Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin-Cyclophosphamide in Women With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Three-Year Results
Autor: | Gavin Stuart, Benny Zee, Salvatore Tumolo, Stan B. Kaye, Benoit Baron, Martine Piccart, M. Nardi, R. Grimshaw, James Paul, Kamma Bertelsen, Monica Bacon, Joern Erik Andersen, Sergio Pecorelli, Berit Lindvall, Ken D. Swenerton, Jim Cassidy, René Blom, Ignace Vergote, Janne Kærn, Angelo Birt, Keith James, Constantino Mangioni, Ronald J. Atkinson, François Lhoas, Ernst Simonsen, Claes G. Tropé, Josee Anne Roy, Petra Timmers |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2000 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Oncology Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Neutropenia Time Factors Randomization Paclitaxel Cyclophosphamide Vomiting medicine.medical_treatment Gynecologic oncology law.invention Randomized controlled trial law Internal medicine Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Clinical endpoint Humans Medicine Aged Neoplasm Staging Aged 80 and over Ovarian Neoplasms Chemotherapy Cross-Over Studies business.industry Alopecia Nausea Middle Aged medicine.disease Combined Modality Therapy Survival Analysis Thrombocytopenia Surgery Regimen Treatment Outcome Disease Progression Female Cisplatin business Ovarian cancer Follow-Up Studies medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 92:699-708 |
ISSN: | 1460-2105 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jnci/92.9.699 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND: A randomized trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG, study #111) in the United States showed a better outcome for patients with advanced ovarian cancer on the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen than for those on a standard cyclophosphamide-cisplatin regimen. Before considering the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen as the new "standard," a group of European and Canadian investigators planned a confirmatory phase III trial. METHODS: This intergroup trial recruited 680 patients with broader selection criteria than the GOG #111 study and administered paclitaxel as a 3-hour instead of a 24-hour infusion; progression-free survival was the primary end point. Patient survival was analyzed by use of the Kaplan-Meier technique. Treatment effects on patient survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The overall clinical response rate was 59% in the paclitaxel group and 45% in the cyclophosphamide group; the complete clinical remission rates were 41% and 27%, respectively; both differences were statistically significant (P =.01 for both). At a median follow-up of 38.5 months and despite a high rate of crossover (48%) from the cyclophosphamide arm to the paclitaxel arm at first detection of progression of disease, a longer progression-free survival (log-rank P =.0005; median of 15.5 months versus 11.5 months) and a longer overall survival (log-rank P =. 0016; median of 35.6 months versus 25.8 months) were seen in the paclitaxel regimen compared with the cyclophosphamide regimen. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong and confirmatory evidence from two large randomized phase III trials to support paclitaxel-cisplatin as the new standard regimen for treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |