High-Volume Hemodiafiltration and Cool Hemodialysis Have a Beneficial Effect on Intradialytic Hemodynamics: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Four Intermittent Dialysis Strategies

Autor: Paul A. Rootjes, Sabrine Chaara, Camiel L.M. de Roij van Zuijdewijn, Menso J. Nubé, Gertrude Wijngaarden, Muriel P.C. Grooteman
Přispěvatelé: Nephrology, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Internal medicine, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Kidney International Reports, 7(9), 1980-1990. Elsevier Inc.
Rootjes, P A, Chaara, S, de Roij van Zuijdewijn, C L M, Nubé, M J, Wijngaarden, G & Grooteman, M P C 2022, ' High-Volume Hemodiafiltration and Cool Hemodialysis Have a Beneficial Effect on Intradialytic Hemodynamics : A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Four Intermittent Dialysis Strategies ', Kidney International Reports, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1980-1990 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2022.06.021
ISSN: 2468-0249
Popis: Introduction: Compared to standard hemodialysis (S-HD), postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been associated with improved survival. Methods: To assess whether intradialytic hemodynamics may play a role in this respect, 40 chronic dialysis patients were cross-over randomized to S-HD (dialysate temperature [Td] 36.5 °C), cooled HD (C-HD; Td 35.5 °C), and HDF (low-volume [LV-HDF)] and high-volume [HV-HDF], both Td 36.5 °C, convection volume 15 liters, and at least 23 liters per session, respectively), each for 2 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every 15 minutes. The primary endpoint was the number of intradialytic hypotensive (IDH) episodes per session. IDH was defined as systolic BP (SBP) less than 90 mmHg for predialysis SBP less than 160 mmHg and less than 100 mmHg for predialysis SBP greater than or equal to 160 mmHg, independent of symptoms and interventions. A post hoc analysis on early-onset IDH was performed as well. Secondary endpoints included intradialytic courses of SBP, diastolic BP (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Results: During S-HD, IDH occurred 0.68 episodes per session, which was 3.2 and 2.5 times higher than during C-HD (0.21 per session, P < 0.0005) and HV-HDF (0.27 per session, P < 0.0005), respectively. Whereas the latter 2 strategies showed similar frequencies, HV-HDF differed significantly from LV-HDF (P = 0.02). A comparable trend was observed for early-onset IDH: S-HD (0.32 per session), C-HD (0.07 per session, P < 0.0005) and HV-HDF (0.10 per session, P = 0.001). SBP, DBP, and MAP declined during S-HD (−6.8, −5.2, −5.2 mmHg per session; P = 0.004, P < 0.0005, P = 0.002 respectively), which was markedly different from C-HD (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Though C-HD and HV-HDF showed the lowest IDH frequency and the best intradialytic hemodynamic stability, all parameters were most disrupted in S-HD. Therefore, the survival benefit of HV-HDF over S-HD may be partly caused by a more beneficial intradialytic BP profile.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: