Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes

Autor: Tine Engberg Damsgaard, Jens Ahm Sørensen, Navid Mohamadpour Toyserkani, Mads Gustaf Jørgensen, Siavosh Tabatabaeifar
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Toyserkani, N M, Jørgensen, M G, Tabatabaeifar, S, Damsgaard, T & Sørensen, J A 2020, ' Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction : A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes ', Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 278-285 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.040
ISSN: 1878-0539
Popis: Objective: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy can increase the quality of life of patients. Reconstruction methods can broadly be divided into implant-based and autologous tissue reconstruction. Patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction are one of the most important success parameters. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the two methods using the recognized Breast-Q questionnaire. Methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Meta-analysis was performed on the five most commonly reported Breast-Q modules. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies. Results: The search strategy resulted in 219 studies of which nine studies were included in the analysis, yielding 2129 implant-based and 825 autologous breast reconstructions. Overall satisfaction with outcome as well as breast was significantly higher among patients with autologous breast reconstructions (mean Breast-Q difference between the two groups was 9.82 [3.09, 16.54], p = 0.004, and 10.33 [95% CI 5.93, 14.74], p
Databáze: OpenAIRE