Disentangling cognitive from motor control: Influence of response modality on updating, inhibiting, and shifting

Autor: Ardi Roelofs, Marpessa J. Rietbergen, Roshan Cools, Hanneke E. M. den Ouden
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Adult
Male
genetic structures
Adolescent
Computer science
Stress-related disorders Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 13]
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
050105 experimental psychology
Language in Interaction
03 medical and health sciences
Executive Function
Young Adult
0302 clinical medicine
Cognition
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
otorhinolaryngologic diseases
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reaction Time
Humans
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Control (linguistics)
Set (psychology)
Psycholinguistics
Neuro- en revalidatiepsychologie
Modalities
Modality (human–computer interaction)
Neuropsychology and rehabilitation psychology
05 social sciences
Motor control
Plasticity and Memory [DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 3]
General Medicine
Inhibition
Psychological
Motor Skills
Motor processes
Female
Language and Communication [DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 1]
170 000 Motivational & Cognitive Control
psychological phenomena and processes
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Photic Stimulation
Cognitive psychology
Zdroj: Acta Psychologica, 191, 124-130
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica, 191, pp. 124-130
ISSN: 1873-6297
0001-6918
Popis: Contains fulltext : 195559.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) It is unclear whether cognitive and motor control are parallel and interactive or serial and independent processes. According to one view, cognitive control refers to a set of modality-nonspecific processes that act on supramodal representations and precede response modality-specific motor processes. An alternative view is that cognitive control represents a set of modality-specific operations that act directly on motor-related representations, implying dependence of cognitive control on motor control. Here, we examined the influence of response modality (vocal vs. manual) on three well-established subcomponent processes of cognitive control: shifting, inhibiting, and updating. We observed effects of all subcomponent processes in reaction times. The magnitude of these effects did not differ between response modalities for shifting and inhibiting, in line with a serial, supramodal view. However, the magnitude of the updating effect differed between modalities, in line with an interactive, modality-specific view. These results suggest that updating represents a modality-specific operation that depends on motor control, whereas shifting and inhibiting represent supramodal operations that act independently of motor control. 7 p.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: