Appropriate surgical margin for odontogenic myxoma: a review of 12 cases
| Autor: | Toshiyuki Izumo, Hiroyuki Harada, Yukinobu Takahashi, Eriko Marukawa, Hideaki Hirai, Kae Tanaka |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Surgical margin medicine.medical_treatment Enucleation Odontogenic Tumors Osteotomy Odontogenic myxoma Pathology and Forensic Medicine Benign tumor 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Dentistry (miscellaneous) Aged Retrospective Studies business.industry Mandible Margins of Excision 030206 dentistry Middle Aged medicine.disease Segmental Mandibulectomy Surgery Treatment Outcome 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Maxilla Female Oral Surgery business Myxoma |
| Zdroj: | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 126:404-408 |
| ISSN: | 2212-4403 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.06.002 |
| Popis: | Objective Odontogenic myxoma (OM) is a rare benign tumor that is frequently nonencapsulated and invades the surrounding bone, resulting in a high risk of recurrence. However, the optimal surgical technique and appropriate surgical margin remains controversial. Here, we report our clinical investigation of 12 patients with OM diagnosed histopathologically. Study Design We retrospectively reviewed the records of 12 patients treated at our institution. Osteotomy or bone shaving with enucleation was generally performed with 5-mm bony margins from the radiologic extent of the tumor. Results One half of the cases occurred in the maxilla and the other half in the mandible. Treatment for maxillary OM was enucleation in 2 patients and maxillectomy in 4 patients. Treatment for mandibular OM was enucleation with shaving of the surrounding bone in 1 patient and segmental mandibulectomy in 5 patients. Radiographs of surgical specimen removed by segmental mandibulectomy indicated that the mean distance between the tumor and the margin was 5.4 (range 3.4–7.0) mm. Tumor recurrence was noted in 1 patient who had undergone enucleation alone. Conclusion The 1-cm surgical margin for OM, as reported conventionally, might not be necessary. A prospective study is needed to determine the appropriate surgical margin for OM. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect