Physics webpages create barriers to participation for people with disabilities: five common web accessibility errors and possible solutions
Autor: | John Raible, Erin Scanlon, Jacob Bates, Zachary W. Taylor, Jacquelyn J. Chini |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Americans with Disabilities Act
Sample (statistics) 0102 computer and information sciences 01 natural sciences Science education lcsh:Education (General) lcsh:LB5-3640 Education World Wide Web Web page Curriculum lcsh:LC8-6691 Webpage accessibility lcsh:Special aspects of education 05 social sciences Educational technology 050301 education STEM Accessibility Physics Education lcsh:Theory and practice of education Section 508 010201 computation theory & mathematics OS X User interface lcsh:L lcsh:L7-991 0503 education lcsh:Education Web accessibility |
Zdroj: | International Journal of STEM Education, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2021) |
ISSN: | 2196-7822 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s40594-021-00282-3 |
Popis: | Background While there have been numerous calls to increase the participation of people with disabilities in STEM, many postsecondary institutions are not equipped to support students with disabilities. We examined the accessibility of 139 webpages from 73 postsecondary institutions in the USA that contained information about the undergraduate physics curriculum and graduate research programs. We selected these webpages as they are common entry points for students interested in pursuing a physics degree. We used Tenon and Mac OS X’s VoiceOver software to assess the level of accessibility of these webpages as measured by alignment with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Results We found that only one webpage had minimal accessibility errors (i.e., 10 errors), while the other webpages had numerous accessibility errors. Five specific error types accounted for the majority of all errors. The five most common errors were related to information, structure, and relationships of content (1.3.1 Level A; 39.7%); text alternatives for non-text content (1.1.1 Level A; 27.0%); information about link purpose (2.4.4 Level A; 14.7%); capability to resize text (1.4.4 Level AA; 10.0%); and information about the name, role, and value of user interface components (4.1.2 Level A; 11.2%). Conclusions We present and describe the five common accessibility errors we identified in the webpages in our sample, suggest solutions for these errors, and provide implications for students with disabilities, instructors and staff, institutional administration, and the broader physics community. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |