Shape of the anterior cornea: comparison of height data from 4 corneal topographers

Autor: Nomdo M. Jansonius, Tim de Jong, Matthew Sheehan, M. Dubbelman, Steven A. Koopmans
Přispěvatelé: Perceptual and Cognitive Neuroscience (PCN), Physics and medical technology, Other Research
Rok vydání: 2012
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 39(10), 1570-1580. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
de Jong, T, Sheehan, M T, Dubbelman, M, Koopmans, S A & Jansonius, N M 2013, ' Shape of the anterior cornea: Comparison of height data from 4 corneal topographers ', Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1570-1580 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.032
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 39(10), 1570-1580. Elsevier Inc.
ISSN: 1873-4502
0886-3350
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.032
Popis: Purpose To compare the ability of clinical corneal topographers to describe the shape of the anterior cornea for optical modeling. Setting University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. Design Cross-sectional study. Methods The anterior corneal shape of healthy subjects was assessed with 4 topographers (Atlas Placido disk, Galilei dual Scheimpflug, Orbscan scanning slit, Pentacam single Scheimpflug). Exported height data were fit with Zernike polynomials. Mean values with the standard deviation, interdevice variability, and test–retest variability were determined for the defocus Z(2,0), astigmatism Z(2,−2) and Z(2,2), coma Z(3,−1) and Z(3,1), and spherical aberration Z(4,0) coefficients for 5.5 mm and 8.0 mm diameters. Results At 5.5 mm, the single Scheimpflug topographer showed the smallest coefficient of repeatability; 0.31 μm for Z(2,0); 0.40 and 0.34 μm for Z(2,−2) and Z(2,2), respectively; 0.15 and 0.11 μm for Z(3,−1) and Z(3,1), respectively; and 0.08 μm for Z(4,0); the other topographers showed up to 10 times larger coefficients of repeatability. The (unsigned) mean differences between the topographers were in the range of 0.20 to 1.21 μm for Z(2,0); 0.02 to 0.31 μm and 0.06 to 0.42 μm for Z(2,−2) and Z(2,2), respectively; 0.03 to 0.18 μm and 0.03 to 0.35 μm for Z(3,−1) and Z(3,1), respectively; and 0.00 to 0.14 μm for Z(4,0). The Placido-disk topographer and single Scheimpflug topographer data corresponded best. Similar trends were found at 8.0 mm. Conclusion Test–retest variability hampered a detailed description of the anterior corneal shape at the level of individual subjects; interdevice variability compromises the exchangeability of the devices. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Databáze: OpenAIRE