Liver cirrhosis in England-an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly?
| Autor: | Kate M. Fleming, Sonia Ratib, Joe West |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Liver Cirrhosis Male medicine.medical_specialty Chronic condition Cirrhosis Databases Factual Population Gastroenterology and Hepatology Liver cirrhosis Mortality Incidence Routine data 03 medical and health sciences Liver disease Age Distribution 0302 clinical medicine Internal medicine medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Sex Distribution Mortality education Aged education.field_of_study Wales business.industry Incidence Research Routine data Incidence (epidemiology) Mortality rate General Medicine Middle Aged medicine.disease Surgery England Regression Analysis Female 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Observational study Diagnosis code business |
| Zdroj: | BMJ OPEN BMJ Open |
| ISSN: | 2044-6055 |
| Popis: | Objectives: Mortality due to liver disease (of which cirrhosis is the end‐stage) is increasing more than any other chronic condition in the UK. This study aims to demonstrate that (i) exclusive reliance on mortality rates may not reveal the true burden of liver cirrhosis, and (ii) diverse use of diagnostic coding may produce misleading estimates. Design: Observational study Setting: The Office for National Statistics death registry was interrogated to investigate liver cirrhosis mortality trends in England and Wales, from 1968 to 2011. Main outcome: Standardised mortality trends according to three different definitions of liver cirrhosis based on the specificity of diagnostic codes were calculated: 1(chronic liver diseases), 2 (alcoholic and unspecified cirrhosis only) and 3 (cirrhosis as end‐stage liver disease). The mortality trends were compared to incidence rates established in a previous population‐based study (based on definition 3), from 1998 to 2009, to investigate discrepancies between these two measures. Results: Over the study period, the overall standardised liver cirrhosis mortality rates were 8·8, 5∙1 and 5∙4 per 100,000 person‐years for definitions 1, 2 and 3 of respectively. The mortality rates for definition 3 in 1998 and 2009 were 6∙2 and 5∙9 per 100,000 person‐years respectively; whilst the equivalent incidence rates were at least three‐ and six‐fold higher: 23∙4 and 35∙9 per 100,000 person-years respectively. This discrepancy between incidence and mortality rates was also at least three‐fold in men and women separately, and across age‐groups. Conclusion: Mortality rates underestimated the incidence of liver cirrhosis by at least three‐fold between 1998 and 2009 and varied with differing definitions of disease. Mortality data should not be used exclusively as an indicator for the occurrence of liver cirrhosis in the population. Routinely collected healthcare data are available to measure occurrence of this disease. Careful consideration should be taken when selecting diagnostic codes for cirrhosis. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|