Simple elective cholecystectomy: To drain or not
Autor: | Lewis Rt, Walter Lloyd-Smith, R. Graydon Goodall, Frederick M. Wiegand, Myung Park, Breen Marien |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 1990 |
Předmět: |
Male
Suction (medicine) medicine.medical_specialty Elective cholecystectomy Suction law.invention Randomized controlled trial Risk Factors Peritoneal drainage law Odds Ratio medicine Humans Surgical Wound Infection Cholecystectomy In patient Statistical analysis Prospective Studies Drainage Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic business.industry General surgery General Medicine Odds ratio Middle Aged Surgery Female Peritoneum business Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | The American Journal of Surgery. 159:241-245 |
ISSN: | 0002-9610 |
DOI: | 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80271-5 |
Popis: | We performed a large single-center prospective randomized controlled study to assess the role of peritoneal drainage in simple elective cholecystectomy. In 248 patients, drains were omitted; 122 patients had closed suction drains and 124 had Penrose drains. There were no deaths, and no patient required reoperation or drainage of a subhepatic collection. Wound infections occurred in eight patients with drains and in six patients without. Most infections were staphylococcal. Postoperative pulmonary complications and hospital stays were similar in patients with and without drains. Statistical analysis of the 10 available prospective controlled randomized studies (1,920 patients) by the method of odds ratios supported our findings. Simple elective cholecystectomy is safe without peritoneal drainage, but short-term drains do not increase morbidity. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |