Acupuncture-Related Therapies for Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Qualitative Review
| Autor: | Shuqi Ge, Yao Xianli, Hao Wen, Xiaopeng Wen, Bing Jiao, Sun Pingge, Qian Wang, Liming Lu, Li Kunbin, Wu Zhiyuan, Chenyang Wen |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Aging
medicine.medical_specialty Cognitive Neuroscience Parkinson's disease MEDLINE Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Cochrane Library 030226 pharmacology & pharmacy law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law Rating scale Hamd medicine Acupuncture qualitative review Confidence interval meta-analysis conventional medication Meta-analysis Physical therapy Systematic Review acupuncture-related therapies 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Neuroscience RC321-571 |
| Zdroj: | Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Vol 13 (2021) Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience |
| ISSN: | 1663-4365 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.676827/full |
| Popis: | Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of the combination of acupuncture-related therapies with conventional medication compared with conventional medication in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Methods: A literature search within eight databases [including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine (CBM), VIP, and Wanfang Database] was performed covering a time frame from their inception to August 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture-related therapies combined with conventional medication vs. conventional medication in patients with PD were eligible. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias. Assessments were performed with the total and subscales scores of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), the dosage of Madopar, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD). Data were analyzed by adopting the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.4 (Review Man, Copenhagen, Denmark); and mean effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Tests for heterogeneity were used to assess differences in treatment effects across different types of acupuncture used.Results: Sixty-six trials met the inclusion criteria, of which 61 trials provided data for the meta-analysis. We defined high-quality articles as those with a low risk of bias in four or more domains; and only 10 (15.15%) articles were of high quality. Compared with the controls, acupuncture-related therapies with conventional medication achieved a benefit in the primary outcomes of UPDRS (motor subscore: −3.90, −4.33 to −3.49, P < 0.01; total score: −7.37 points, −8.91 to −5.82, P < 0.001; activities of daily living subscore: −3.96, −4.96 to −2.95, P < 0.01). For the subgroup difference test among the effects of different acupuncture methods, significant differences existed in outcomes with the UPDRS-III, UPDRS-I, UPDRS-IV, and PDQ-39 scores and Madopar dosage, while non-significant differences existed with the UPDRS-total, UPDRS-II, HAMD, and MMSE scores.Conclusions: Acupuncture-related therapies combined with conventional medication may benefit individuals with PD. Our review findings should be considered with caution because of the methodological weaknesses in the included trials. Future, large randomized trials of acupuncture-related therapies for PD with high methodological quality are warranted.Systematic Review Registration: Identifier CRD42021228110. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|