Comment on ''Inconsistency of the conventional theory of superconductivity'' by Hirsch J.E
Autor: | Michel Abou Ghantous, Jacob Szeftel, Antoine Khater, Nicolas Sandeau |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Laboratoire de Photonique Quantique et Moléculaire (LPQM), École normale supérieure - Cachan (ENS Cachan)-CentraleSupélec-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut FRESNEL (FRESNEL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU), American University of Technology (AUT), Laboratoire de physique de l'état condensé (LPEC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Le Mans Université (UM), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Molécules et Matériaux du Mans (IMMM), Le Mans Université (UM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Superconductivity
Philosophy Joule effect Rebuttal FOS: Physical sciences General Physics and Astronomy 16. Peace & justice 01 natural sciences 010305 fluids & plasmas [PHYS.COND.CM-S]Physics [physics]/Condensed Matter [cond-mat]/Superconductivity [cond-mat.supr-con] Theoretical physics General Physics (physics.gen-ph) Physics - General Physics Meissner effect Argument 0103 physical sciences 010306 general physics First law of thermodynamics ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS |
Zdroj: | EPL-Europhysics Letters EPL-Europhysics Letters, European Physical Society/EDP Sciences/Società Italiana di Fisica/IOP Publishing, 2020, 131 (1), pp.17003. ⟨10.1209/0295-5075/131/17003⟩ EPL-Europhysics Letters, 2020, 131 (1), pp.17003. ⟨10.1209/0295-5075/131/17003⟩ |
ISSN: | 0295-5075 1286-4854 |
DOI: | 10.1209/0295-5075/131/17003⟩ |
Popis: | A rebuttal of a recent article by Hirsch J.E. is presented below. To begin with, the main assumption, regarding the Meissner effect, which the whole argument relies upon, is disproved. Besides, the subsequent analysis misconstrues an original view of the Meissner effect by other authors [2]. Finally, the discussion of the Joule effect turns out to violate the first law of thermodynamics. Comment on arXiv:2001.07509, arXiv:1907.11273, arXiv:1909.12786 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |