Is it safe and effective to maintain the vaginal pessary without removing it for 2 consecutive years?
| Autor: | José-Luis Dueñas-Díez, Manuel Fernández-Sánchez, Juan Polo-Padillo, Alessio Miceli |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Pessary
medicine.medical_specialty Urology 030232 urology & nephrology Vaginal pessary Severity of Illness Index Urinary Urge Incontinence Pelvic Organ Prolapse 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Continuous use Medicine Humans In patient Prospective Studies Adverse effect 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine business.industry Obstetrics and Gynecology Pessaries Surgery Discontinuation Treatment Outcome Observational study Female business |
| Zdroj: | International urogynecology journal. 31(12) |
| ISSN: | 1433-3023 |
| Popis: | The study was aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of ring pessaries without support under continuous use without periodic removal or replacement for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women for 2 consecutive years. This study was a prospective observational study. A total of 123 women were recruited in a tertiary hospital from January 2013 to January 2016. The primary objective was the percentage of patients maintaining the use of the pessary after 24 months. The secondary objectives were the reasons for discontinuation and the adverse events in patients with successful fittings. A total of 115 patients (93.5%) had a successful fitting. Four patients died of non-pessary-related causes during the study and, one patient dropped out the follow-up so that finally, 110 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Pessary use was maintained by 91.8% of the women at the end of the study. The adverse events rate was low (27.0%). The two main factors of interruption in the pessary use were: age (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.87–0.99) and history of urinary urge incontinence (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.11–0.96]). A high success rate and low adverse events rate were achieved in patients with advanced-stage POP with continuous pessary use for 24 months, indicating that a ring pessary could also be used without periodic removal for at least the first 2 years. This practice could reduce the number of control visits. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink