Where is critical analysis of power and positionality in knowledge translation?
| Autor: | Ngoc Huynh, Helen Brown, Eunice Bawafaa, Chloe Crosschild, Ismalia de Sousa |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Integrated knowledge translation
Canada Knowledge user Context (language use) Resistance (psychoanalysis) Knowledge translation Power (social and political) Translational Research Biomedical 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Relationality Indigenous knowledge Reflexivity Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Sociology Traditional knowledge Standpoint theory Critical reflexivity Critical theory Black feminist thought 030503 health policy & services Health Policy Research Personnel Epistemology Power dynamics Knowledge Commentary Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 0305 other medical science |
| Zdroj: | Health Research Policy and Systems Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) |
| ISSN: | 1478-4505 |
| Popis: | In Canada, the Eurocentric epistemological foundations of knowledge translation (KT) approaches and practices have been significantly influenced by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) KT definition. More recently, integrated knowledge translation (IKT) has emerged in part as epistemic resistance to Eurocentric discourse to critically analyse power relations between researcher and participants. Yet, despite the proliferation of IKT literature, issues of power in research relationships and strategies to equalize relationships remain largely unaddressed. In this paper, we analyse the gaps in current IKT theorizing against the backdrop of the CIHR KT definition by drawing on critical scholars, specifically those writing about standpoint theory and critical reflexivity, to advance IKT practice that worked to surface and change research-based power dynamics within the context of health research systems and policy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink