Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users

Autor: Maria Lucia Oliveira de Souza Formigoni, Juliana Nichterwitz Scherer, Flavio Pechansky, Felix Kessler, Melina Nogueira de Castro, Daniela Benzano, Marcelo Santos Cruz, Nino Cesar Marchi, Mayra Pacheco Pachado, Luciano Santos Pinto Guimarães, Silvia Chwartzmann Halpern, Gerson Siegmund
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Volume: 39, Issue: 4, Pages: 346-351, Published: 30 AUG 2017
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol 39, Iss 4, Pp 346-351 (2017)
Popis: SENAD National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse Objective: Many studies correlate characteristics of family functioning and the development of drug addiction. This study sought to evaluate and compare the family environment styles of two groups of psychoactive substance users: 1) alcohol-only users and 2) crack-cocaine users. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-four users of alcohol, crack-cocaine, and other drugs, recruited from research centers in four Brazilian capitals participated in this study. Subjects were evaluated through the Family Environment Scale and the Addiction Severity Index, 6th version (ASI-6). ASI-6 t-scores were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. A final model was obtained using a logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for partner, age, and psychiatric t-score. Results: We found a significant difference between groups in the cohesion subscale (p = 0.044). The post-hoc test revealed a difference of 1.06 points (95% CI 0.11-2.01) between groups 1 (6.45 +/- 0.28) and 2 (5.38 +/- 0.20). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other subscales. However, categorical analyses of variables regarding family dynamic showed that crack users more often reported that sometimes people in their family hit each other (30.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.007) and that people in their family frequently compared each other regarding work and/or school achievement (57.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that families of crack-cocaine users are less cohesive than families of alcohol users. This type of family environment may affect treatment outcome, and should thus be adequately approached. Univ Fed Rio do Grande UFRGS, HCPA, CPAD, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil HCPA, Unidade Bioestat, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Lab Biossinais Fenomenol & Cognicao, Inst Psicol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Psicobiol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro UFRJ, Inst Psiquiatria, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Psicobiol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil SENAD: TC 005/2005 Web of Science
Databáze: OpenAIRE