Reversal of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty and conversion to sleeve gastrectomy – Two case reports

Autor: Qiuye Cheng, Michael Devadas, Michael Edye, Kevin Tree
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
medicine.medical_specialty
Sleeve gastrectomy
Bariatrics
CMP
calcium/magnesium/phosphate

medicine.medical_treatment
BMI
body mass index

Band removal
Article
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
medicine
Gastric balloon
Minimally invasive procedures
ESG
endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
LFT
liver function test

TBWL
total body weight loss

Weight loss surgery
LSG
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Endoscopy
Surgery
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
FBC
full blood count

ECG
electrocardiogram

EUC
electrolyte/urea/creatinine

CT Abdomen/pelvis
computer tomography abdomen/pelvis

business
Weight Loss Surgery
EWL
excess weight loss

Bariatric procedures
Zdroj: International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
ISSN: 2210-2612
Popis: Highlights • ESG conversion to sleeve gastrectomy is feasible and for the most part, uncomplicated. • Conversion of ESG to LSG can be performed safely through a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique. • Return to original stomach anatomy and a meticulous approach in removing most, if not all of the ESG hardware is required for success.
Introduction With the advent of more minimally invasive procedures like endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) for weight loss and metabolic disorders, we are seeing more cases of patients presenting with sub-optimal results for consideration of alternative weight loss surgery. The report aims to describe our experience in converting ESG to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and highlight our suggested technique, challenges and pitfalls. Presentation of cases We described two bariatrics cases detailing our findings on initial endoscopy along with methods used to reverse ESG hardware, followed by issues encountered during sleeve gastrectomy 1 month later. Case 1 being of a 33 year old female (BMI – 50.7) with previous laparoscopic band removal and 2 ESG attempts, while case 2 is a 31 year old female (BMI 44.6) with previously failed gastric balloon and ESG. Discussion ESG reversal was performed without difficulty via endoscopy with visible sutures cut and hardware removed with snares. In both cases, the stomach was easily endoscopically distensible. During sleeve gastrectomy, extra-gastric adhesions along with more gastro-gastric sutures were encountered in case 1. In case 2, ESG hardware was noted on the external surface of stomach with misfiring of 3rd stapler reload during sleeve gastrectomy likely related to unidentified retained hardware. No post-operative complications occurred in either of the cases with adequate weight loss on one month follow up. Conclusion In our experience, ESG conversion to sleeve gastrectomy is feasible and for the most part, uncomplicated. In our case series, we described a two staged approach to conversion although a single staged conversion is theoretically feasible.
Databáze: OpenAIRE