Prograde versus retrograde endoscopic laser therapy for the treatment of malignant esophageal obstruction: A comparison of techniques
| Autor: | Joseph J. Pietrafitta, Richard M. Dwyer, Gary J. Bowers |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1988 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Esophageal Neoplasms Endoscope Dermatology Adenocarcinoma Esophagus Laser therapy Occlusion Biopsy medicine Humans Esophageal Obstruction Aged Aged 80 and over medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Middle Aged Esophageal cancer medicine.disease Endoscopy Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Carcinoma Squamous Cell Esophageal Stenosis Female Esophagoscopy Laser Therapy business |
| Zdroj: | Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 8:288-293 |
| ISSN: | 1096-9101 0196-8092 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/lsm.1900080311 |
| Popis: | The prograde and retrograde approaches to the treatment of malignant esophageal obstruction with the Nd:YAG, or neodymium: yttrium, aluminum, garnet, laser are compared. With the prograde technique, tumor destruction proceeds from the proximal to the distal tumor margin. In retrograde treatment, the endoscope is passed to the distal tumor margin so that the treatment can proceed in the reverse direction, thereby completing therapy in a single treatment session. This is usually accomplished by passage of a guide wire down the biopsy channel of the endoscope, tumor dilatation, and then passage of the endoscope over the guide wire to the distal tumor margin, where laser destruction is begun. Twenty nonrandomly selected patients with malignant esophageal obstruction were studied. The first ten patients were treated with the prograde technique, the next ten with the retrograde technique. The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex, and tumor histologies. Patients treated retrogradely had narrower pretreatment lumens (average 2.3 vs. 4.1 mm) as well as longer tumor lengths (average 8.9 vs. 4.8 cm). The posttreatment luminal diameters were similar for each group: 18.0 mm for prograde; 16.3 for retrograde. In the retrograde group, therapy was completed in fewer treatments (1.6 vs. 2.9) and over a shorter period of time (3.6 vs. 7.8 days), despite the longer tumor lengths. All patients in both groups were able to tolerate a regular diet at the completion of therapy. The complication rate was low in both groups. It is felt that the retrograde technique (single session therapy) is the preferred method because it allows more-rapid treatment without increased complications and thereby shortens hospital stay and reduces hospital costs. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text