Predicting outcomes in partial nephrectomy: is the renal score useful?

Autor: Alexandre Crippa, André Costa Matos, Felipe Coelho Argolo, Marcos Francisco Dall Oglio, José Roberto Colombo, João Alexandre Queiroz Juveniz
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: International braz j urol, Volume: 43, Issue: 3, Pages: 422-431, Published: JUN 2017
International braz j urol v.43 n.3 2017
International Braz J Urol
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, Vol 43, Iss 3, Pp 422-431
International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
ISSN: 1677-5538
Popis: Introduction and Objective The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry system (RNS) has been validated in multiple open, laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy series. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry system in predicting perioperative outcomes in surgical treatment of kidney tumors 20 min, versus 41.4% and 64.3% MC and HC groups respectively (p=0.03); AUC=0.643 (p=0.07). RNS was associated with convertion rate (LC:28.6% ; MC:47.6%; HC:77.3%, p=0.02). Patients with RNS 8 had 6.06 times greater chance of having a surgery duration >180 min. (p=0.017), AUC=0.63 (p=0.059). R.E.N.A.L. score did not correlate with EBL, complications (Clavien >3), LOS or positive surgical margin. Conclusion R.E.N.A.L. score was a good method in predicting surgical access route and type of nephrectomy. Also was associated with OT and WIT, but with weak accuracy. Although, RNS was not associated with Clavien >3, EBL, LOS or positive surgical margin.
Databáze: OpenAIRE