Connections in scientific committees and applicants’ self-selection: Evidence from a natural randomized experiment
Autor: | Manuel Bagues, Natalia Zinovyeva, Mauro Sylos-Labini |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Department of Economics, University of Pisa, Aalto-yliopisto, Aalto University |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
HD
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Economics and Econometrics Labour economics Actuarial science ta511 Randomized experiment media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Connections Self-selection HM Q1 Affect (psychology) Academic labor markets Luck 0502 economics and business Selection (linguistics) Natural (music) Relevance (law) 050207 economics Psychology 050205 econometrics media_common |
Zdroj: | LABOUR ECONOMICS. 58:81-97 |
ISSN: | 0927-5371 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.labeco.2019.04.005 |
Popis: | We investigate theoretically and empirically how connections in evaluation committees affect application decisions. Prospective candidates who are connected to a committee member may be more likely to apply if they anticipate a premium at the evaluation stage. However, when failure is costly and connections convey information to potential applicants regarding their chances of success, the impact of connections on application decisions is ambiguous. We document the relevance of this information channel using data from national evaluations in Italian academia. We find that prospective candidates are significantly less likely to apply when the committee includes, through the luck of the draw, a colleague, a coauthor or a Ph.D. advisor. At the same time, applicants tend to receive more favorable evaluations from their connections. Overall, the evidence suggests that connected individuals have access to better information at the application stage, which helps them to make better application decisions. Ignoring applicants’ self-selection would lead to an overestimation of the connection premium in evaluations by 29%. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |