Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: systematic review and meta-analysis
| Autor: | Carlos De la Fuente, Luis Javier Chirosa, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Javiera Fuentes, Claudio Chamorro |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Reproducibility of results
musculoskeletal diseases medicine.medical_specialty Concurrent validity lower extremitie 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Physical medicine and rehabilitation Medicine Reliability (statistics) Lower extremitie Muscle strength business.industry Hand held 030229 sport sciences General Medicine musculoskeletal system Confidence interval medicine.anatomical_structure Standard error Isokinetic dynamometer Meta-analysis muscle strength reproducibility of results Ankle business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Regular Articles |
| Zdroj: | Open Medicine, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 359-375 (2017) Open Medicine |
| ISSN: | 2391-5463 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/med-2017-0052 |
| Popis: | Indexación: Scopus. The purpose of the study is to establish absolute reliability and concurrent validity between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in lower extremity peak torque assessment. Medline, Embase, CINAHL databases were searched for studies related to psychometric properties in muscle dynamometry. Studies considering standard error of measurement SEM (%) or limit of agreement LOA (%) expressed as percentage of the mean, were considered to establish absolute reliability while studies using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were considered to establish concurrent validity between dynamometers. In total, 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The COSMIN checklist classified them between fair and poor. Using HHDs, knee extension LOA (%) was 33.59%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.91 to 43.26 and ankle plantar flexion LOA (%) was 48.87%, CI 35.19 to 62.56. Using IDs, hip adduction and extension; knee flexion and extension; and ankle dorsiflexion showed LOA (%) under 15%. Lower hip, knee, and ankle LOA (%) were obtained using an ID compared to HHD. ICC between devices ranged between 0.62, CI (0.37 to 0.87) for ankle dorsiflexion to 0.94, IC (0.91to 0.98) for hip adduction. Very high correlation were found for hip adductors and hip flexors and moderate correlations for knee flexors/extensors and ankle plantar/dorsiflexors. https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/med.2017.12.issue-1/med-2017-0052/med-2017-0052.xml |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|