Position paper on olfactory dysfunction
Autor: | Giulio Cesare Passali, Ioannis Konstantinidis, R Moesges, Hilmar Gudziol, Christian A. Mueller, R A Schlosser, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Yehudah Roth, Boris A. Stuck, Antje Haehner, Michael Damm, Eric H. Holbrook, Carl Philpott, V J Ramakrishnan, Philippe Rombaux, Donald A. Leopold, Reda Kamel, Jan Vodička, Seok-Chan Hong, Neelima Gupta, Johannes Frasnelli, Giancarlo Ottaviano, Alberto Macchi, Richard M. Costanzo, David E. Hornung, Takaki Miwa, K.-B. Hüttenbrink, Basile Nicolas Landis, Thomas Hummel, J Mullol, C Cinghi, Katherine L. Whitcroft, Jayant M. Pinto, Peter Andrews, B Shu, Pär Stjärne, Aytug Altundag, Antje Welge-Luessen, Graciela M. Soler |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | UCL - (SLuc) Service d'oto-rhino-laryngologie, UCL - SSS/IONS/NEUR - Clinical Neuroscience |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
media_common.quotation_subject definition olfactory dysfunction MEDLINE Medizin Translational research Neuropsychological Tests olfactory dysfunction 03 medical and health sciences Olfaction Disorders 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life (healthcare) Physical medicine and rehabilitation Event-related potential treatment olfactory dysfunction medicine Olfactometry Humans Quality (business) guidelines 030223 otorhinolaryngology Reliability (statistics) media_common business.industry neurodegeneration General Medicine olfactory loss olfactory training Parosmia Olfactory Perception Surgery ddc:616.8 methodological quality Otorhinolaryngology Quality of Life Position paper Settore MED/31 - OTORINOLARINGOIATRIA medicine.symptom INGLESE business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Rhinology (2017) Rhinology. Supplement, Vol. 54, no. 26, p. 1-30 (2017) |
ISSN: | 0300-0729 |
Popis: | Olfactory dysfunction is an increasingly recognised condition, associated with reduced quality of life and major health outcomes such as neurodegeneration and death. However, translational research in this field is limited by heterogeneity in methodological approach, including definitions of impairment, improvement and appropriate assessment techniques. Accordingly, effective treatments for smell loss are limited. In an effort to encourage high quality and comparable work in this field, among others, we propose the following ideas and recommendations. Whilst the full set of recommendations are outlined in the main document, points include the following: • Patients with suspected olfactory loss should undergo a full examination of the head and neck, including rigid nasal endoscopy with small diameter endoscopes. • Subjective olfactory assessment should not be undertaken in isolation, given its poor reliability. • Psychophysical assessment tools used in clinical and research settings should include reliable and validated tests of odour threshold, and/or one of odour identification or discrimination. • Comprehensive chemosensory assessment should include gustatory screening. • Smell training can be helpful in patients with olfactory loss of several aetiologies.We hope the current manuscript will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency and generalisability of work in this field. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |