Position paper on olfactory dysfunction

Autor: Giulio Cesare Passali, Ioannis Konstantinidis, R Moesges, Hilmar Gudziol, Christian A. Mueller, R A Schlosser, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Yehudah Roth, Boris A. Stuck, Antje Haehner, Michael Damm, Eric H. Holbrook, Carl Philpott, V J Ramakrishnan, Philippe Rombaux, Donald A. Leopold, Reda Kamel, Jan Vodička, Seok-Chan Hong, Neelima Gupta, Johannes Frasnelli, Giancarlo Ottaviano, Alberto Macchi, Richard M. Costanzo, David E. Hornung, Takaki Miwa, K.-B. Hüttenbrink, Basile Nicolas Landis, Thomas Hummel, J Mullol, C Cinghi, Katherine L. Whitcroft, Jayant M. Pinto, Peter Andrews, B Shu, Pär Stjärne, Aytug Altundag, Antje Welge-Luessen, Graciela M. Soler
Přispěvatelé: UCL - (SLuc) Service d'oto-rhino-laryngologie, UCL - SSS/IONS/NEUR - Clinical Neuroscience
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
medicine.medical_specialty
media_common.quotation_subject
definition olfactory dysfunction
MEDLINE
Medizin
Translational research
Neuropsychological Tests
olfactory dysfunction
03 medical and health sciences
Olfaction Disorders
0302 clinical medicine
Quality of life (healthcare)
Physical medicine and rehabilitation
Event-related potential
treatment olfactory dysfunction
medicine
Olfactometry
Humans
Quality (business)
guidelines
030223 otorhinolaryngology
Reliability (statistics)
media_common
business.industry
neurodegeneration
General Medicine
olfactory loss
olfactory training
Parosmia
Olfactory Perception
Surgery
ddc:616.8
methodological quality
Otorhinolaryngology
Quality of Life
Position paper
Settore MED/31 - OTORINOLARINGOIATRIA
medicine.symptom
INGLESE
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Zdroj: Rhinology (2017)
Rhinology. Supplement, Vol. 54, no. 26, p. 1-30 (2017)
ISSN: 0300-0729
Popis: Olfactory dysfunction is an increasingly recognised condition, associated with reduced quality of life and major health outcomes such as neurodegeneration and death. However, translational research in this field is limited by heterogeneity in methodological approach, including definitions of impairment, improvement and appropriate assessment techniques. Accordingly, effective treatments for smell loss are limited. In an effort to encourage high quality and comparable work in this field, among others, we propose the following ideas and recommendations. Whilst the full set of recommendations are outlined in the main document, points include the following: • Patients with suspected olfactory loss should undergo a full examination of the head and neck, including rigid nasal endoscopy with small diameter endoscopes. • Subjective olfactory assessment should not be undertaken in isolation, given its poor reliability. • Psychophysical assessment tools used in clinical and research settings should include reliable and validated tests of odour threshold, and/or one of odour identification or discrimination. • Comprehensive chemosensory assessment should include gustatory screening. • Smell training can be helpful in patients with olfactory loss of several aetiologies.We hope the current manuscript will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency and generalisability of work in this field.
Databáze: OpenAIRE