Differences in attractiveness comparing female profile modifications of Class II Division 1 malocclusion
| Autor: | Reinder Kuitert, Sebahat Yesim Iskender, Oyku Dalci, Alexandra K. Papadopoulou, Kerem Dalci, M. Ali Darendeliler, Aylin Gözde Yüksel |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Attractiveness
Adult Male Chin Adolescent Dentistry Orthodontics Retrognathia Malocclusion Angle Class II 050105 experimental psychology Mandibular retrognathia 03 medical and health sciences Beauty Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine medicine Class II division 1 malocclusion Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences business.industry 05 social sciences 030206 dentistry medicine.disease Nasolabial angle Female Malocclusion business Neck |
| Zdroj: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 152(4) |
| ISSN: | 1097-6752 |
| Popis: | Introduction Our objective was to study the perceptions of laypeople for digital alterations and the amount of nasolabial angle increase that is tolerable and how much chin-neck length increase is needed to achieve a desirable profile in Class II Division 1 women with mandibular retrognathia. Methods The profile image of a white woman with a Class II Division 1 mandibular rethrognatic profile was digitally modified to create 6 images: 3 with stepwise increased nasolabial angles of 113°, 121°, and 129°, and 3 with stepwise increased chin-neck distances of 51, 54, and 57 mm. These images were assessed and ranked by 155 white laypeople. Results The baseline profile was judged significantly as the least attractive. A nasolabial angle of 129° was judged as unattractive as the baseline profile. Profiles with a chin-neck length of 54 and 57 mm were equally judged as most attractive. Conclusions The untreated (baseline) profile was found to be least esthetic, as well as the profile with the largest nasolabial angle. Nasolabial angle increases up to 121° seem to be acceptable. Profiles simulating a chin-neck length increase as produced by surgery seem to be most favored. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect