The Milkybar 'Kid': Nestlé, childhood obesity and the regulation of advertising of high sugar and fat ultra-processed products
| Autor: | Stephen Turner, C. M. Jones |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry Public health 030209 endocrinology & metabolism Advertising medicine.disease Childhood obesity Compliance (psychology) Product (business) 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Argument medicine Complaint Food processing High sugar 030212 general & internal medicine Business General Dentistry |
| Zdroj: | Turner, S & Jones, C 2018, ' The Milkybar 'Kid': Nestlé, childhood obesity and the regulation of advertising of high sugar and fat ultra-processed products ', British Dental Journal, vol. 225, no. 8, pp. 771-776 . https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.868 |
| ISSN: | 1476-5373 |
| Popis: | We report a case of public health activism which began as a formal complaint lodged with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) on 24 June 2017 against Nestle, a major global ultra-processed food manufacturer. A television advertisement for Nestle's Milkybar included the copy 'It's the simple things that are the most fun. That's why milk is now our No.1 ingredient'. However, the main nutritional constituent in Milkybar is sugar at 53%, and therefore we complained to the ASA that the advert was misleading. The ASA rejected the complaint, referring to the manufacturer's claim that milk, at 37%, was the biggest ingredient, rather than constituent, and therefore the advert was not misleading. We countered that the largest ingredient was not milk, but milk powder, a processed food, the lactose from which contributes to the 53% free sugars in the product. This argument was also rejected by the ASA, as were later complaints to Food Standards Scotland (FSS) regarding Nestle's failure to provide front of pack colour coded nutritional information despite their being party to a voluntary agreement to do so in 2013. An enquiry to Nestle was met by a response citing the voluntary nature of the nutritional information agreement, and lack of space on packs. A final email to Nestle claiming a breach of their corporate business principles was rejected. We conclude that the ASA's decision not to investigate our case fully represents a failure to protect the public from misleading advertising, undermining the ASA's own role and campaign to regulate advertising that may contribute to childhood obesity and dental caries. FSS appears relaxed about Nestle's lack of compliance with the nutritional information agreement. Despite this experience, we recommend that complaints to regulatory bodies such as the ASA and FSS continue, if only to expose the weakness of current regulations. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink