Differences in nomenclature usage and preference among dermatopathologists for 'dysplastic' nevi: A national survey
Autor: | Austin R. Green, Ata Moshiri, Daniel S. Hippe, Caroline Raymundo, Michael Piepkorn, Michi M. Shinohara |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2023 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 50:530-535 |
ISSN: | 1600-0560 0303-6987 |
Popis: | Ongoing controversy exists regarding terminology used to describe atypical melanocytic nevi. Efforts to standardize nomenclature, including the 1992 NIH consensus conference, have been largely unsuccessful. Significant advances have revealed an increasingly detailed genetic picture of melanocytic neoplasms, including strong evidence for the existence of those with "intermediate" behavior.We sent an electronic survey to dermatopathologists (n=846) to assess trends in nomenclature usage and attitudes toward developing new consensus nomenclature for atypical melanocytic nevi.There were 229 complete responses (27.1% response rate). The most used/preferred nomenclature was "dysplastic nevus" (43%/39%, respectively), followed by the NIH-recommended terminology (28%/26%). Three-tier grading systems were most heavily used/preferred (79%/63%). Dermatopathologists based in New England were most likely to use the NIH terminology, whereas "dysplastic nevus" or 'other' were most used elsewhere (p=0.029). Most (76%) expressed at least "moderate" enthusiasm for developing consensus nomenclature, with 47% "very" or "extremely" enthusiastic.Little has changed with the wide variation in terminology for atypical melanocytic nevi. There continues to be no one dominant terminology in use. However, there is enthusiasm for standardization. A new attempt at updated consensus nomenclature may be fruitful. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |