Cortico-cortical evoked potential by single-pulse electrical stimulation is a generally safe procedure
Autor: | Kazumichi Yoshida, Kiyohide Usami, Akihiro Shimotake, Riki Matsumoto, Takeharu Kunieda, Takayuki Kikuchi, Susumu Miyamoto, Akio Ikeda, Masao Matsuhashi, Ryosuke Takahashi, Katsuya Kobayashi |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Drug Resistant Epilepsy Adolescent Stimulation Seizure onset zone 050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Electrode pair Physiology (medical) Humans Medicine 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Evoked potential Evoked Potentials Partial epilepsy Cerebral Cortex business.industry 05 social sciences Single pulse Middle Aged Electric Stimulation Sensory Systems Neurology Anesthesia Female Neurology (clinical) business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Clinical Neurophysiology. 132:1033-1040 |
ISSN: | 1388-2457 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.12.022 |
Popis: | Objective Cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) by single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is useful to investigate effective connectivity and cortical excitability. We aimed to clarify the safety of CCEPs. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 29 consecutive patients with intractable partial epilepsy undergoing chronic subdural grid implantation and CCEP recording. Repetitive SPES (1 Hz) was systematically applied to a pair of adjacent electrodes over almost all electrodes. We evaluated the incidences of afterdischarges (ADs) and clinical seizures. Results Out of 1283 electrode pairs, ADs and clinical seizures were observed in 12 and 5 pairs (0.94% and 0.39%, per electrode pair) in 7 and 3 patients (23.3% and 10.0%, per patient), respectively. Of the 18–82 pairs per patient, ADs and clinical seizures were induced in 0–4 and 0–3 pairs, respectively. Stimulating 4 SOZ (seizure onset zone) (2.5%) and 8 non-SOZ pairs (0.75%) resulted in ADs. We observed clinical seizures in stimulating 4 SOZ (2.5%) and 1 non-SOZ pair (0.09%). The incidence of clinical seizures varied significantly between SOZ and non-SOZ stimulations (p = 0.001), while the difference in AD incidence tended towards significance (p = 0.058). Conclusion Although caution should be taken in stimulating SOZ, CCEP is a safe procedure for presurgical evaluation. Significance CCEP is safe under the established protocol. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |