Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI: performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale
| Autor: | Pietro Biondetti, Dario Raciti, Elena Casiraghi, Valentina Buscarino, Matteo Angelo Manini, Laura Forzenigo, Andrea Esposito |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Liver Cirrhosis
Male Carcinoma Hepatocellular Scale (ratio) Chronic liver disease Sensitivity and Specificity 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging Likert scale Diagnosis Differential 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Predictive Value of Tests Liver nodules Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging In patient Aged Retrospective Studies Ultrasonography Neuroradiology Aged 80 and over Observer Variation medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Liver Neoplasms Area under the curve Magnetic resonance imaging General Medicine Middle Aged Reference Standards medicine.disease Magnetic Resonance Imaging Liver ROC Curve 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Female business Nuclear medicine Precancerous Conditions |
| Zdroj: | La radiologia medica. 125:15-23 |
| ISSN: | 1826-6983 0033-8362 |
| Popis: | To evaluate the performance of the LI-RADS v.2018 scale by comparing it with the Likert scale, in the characterization of liver lesions. A total of 39 patients with chronic liver disease underwent MR examination for characterization of 44 liver lesions. Images were independently analyzed by two radiologists using the LI-RADS scale and by another two radiologists using the Likert scale. The reference standard used was either histopathological evaluation or a 4-year MRI follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. The LI-RADS scale obtained an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%, while the Likert scale achieved an accuracy of 79%, a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 87%, a PPV of 89% and a NPV of 70%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 85% for the LI-RADS scale and 83% for the Likert scale. The inter-observer agreement was strong (k = 0.89) between the LI-RADS evaluators and moderate (k = 0.69) between the Likert evaluators. There was no statistically significant difference between the performances of the two scales; nevertheless, we suggest that the LI-RADS scale be used, as it appeared more objective and consistent. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink