PRIMITIVE CRITICISM AND THE NOVEL: G. H. LEWES AND HIPPOLYTE TAINE ON DICKENS
| Autor: | Peter Melville Logan |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Cultural Studies
Literature English fiction Literature and Literary Theory Casual business.industry media_common.quotation_subject Literature and anthropology Face (sociological concept) Criticism and interpretation Context (language use) Representation (arts) Art Area studies Fine art Portrait Reading (process) Dickens Charles 1812-1870 Fiction Criticism Nineteenth century France business media_common |
| Zdroj: | Victorian Literature and Culture. 46:125-142 |
| ISSN: | 1470-1553 1060-1503 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/s1060150317000353 |
| Popis: | In a controversial article onthe life and fiction of Charles Dickens, George H. Lewes ponders the inexplicable preference of readers for the novelist's too-simplistic characters over the more complex characters of other writers. He finds an answer in the primitive reaction to fine art: “To a savage there is so little suggestion of a human face and form in a painted portrait that it is not even recognized as the representation of a man” (“Dickens” 150). The implication, it would seem, is that readers turn to Dickens because they are similarly incapable of appreciating more refined modes of art. Today the remark reads as gratuitous and insulting to readers, to Dickens, and to the other cultures Lewes stereotypes as savage. At the same time, the casual nature of the passage also suggests that it reflects commonly held beliefs about primitive life, beliefs we do not have but that Lewes and his readers took for granted. He was clearly safe in assuming such a body of common knowledge, for many other articles in theFortnightly Review(in which Lewes's article appeared in 1872) had similar references to primitivism. Reading through the journal issues of the time, the extent to which anthropological concepts had escaped the covers of books on primitive society and taken up residence in the pages of review essays on contemporary issues – from history, to life in the colonies, to life in Britain itself – is striking. In its print context, the comment about savages and art is less isolated and inexplicable than it is representative of a broad turn to the topic of primitivism in social commentary and analysis during the 1870s. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|