The genetic architecture of the maize progenitor, teosinte, and how it was altered during maize domestication

Autor: Maria Cinta Romay, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra, Qi Sun, Bode A. Olukolu, John Doebley, Qiuyue Chen, Edward S. Buckler, Anne Lorant, Peter J. Bradbury, Michael A. Neumeyer, Chin Jian Yang, James B. Holland, Luis Fernando Samayoa
Přispěvatelé: Mauricio, Rodney
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Cancer Research
Heredity
Population genetics
Plant Science
QH426-470
Plant Genetics
Domestication
0302 clinical medicine
Gene Frequency
Plant Genomics
Natural Selection
Genetics (clinical)
0303 health sciences
education.field_of_study
Natural selection
Eukaryota
Genomics
Plants
Experimental Organism Systems
Engineering and Technology
Research Article
Biotechnology
Gene Flow
Evolutionary Processes
Animal Types
Population
Quantitative Trait Loci
Bioengineering
Quantitative trait locus
Biology
Research and Analysis Methods
Genes
Plant

Zea mays
Quantitative Trait
03 medical and health sciences
Model Organisms
Quantitative Trait
Heritable

Genetic
Plant and Algal Models
Genetic variation
Genetics
Animals
Domestic Animals
Grasses
Allele
Selection
Genetic

education
Heritable
Selection
Molecular Biology
Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematics

030304 developmental biology
Crop Genetics
Evolutionary Biology
Population Biology
Human Genome
Organisms
Biology and Life Sciences
Genetic Variation
Plant
Genetic architecture
Maize
Genetics
Population

Genes
Evolutionary biology
Genetic Loci
Animal Studies
Plant Biotechnology
Zoology
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Population Genetics
Developmental Biology
Zdroj: PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e1008791 (2020)
PLoS genetics, vol 16, iss 5
ISSN: 1553-7404
1553-7390
Popis: The genetics of domestication has been extensively studied ever since the rediscovery of Mendel’s law of inheritance and much has been learned about the genetic control of trait differences between crops and their ancestors. Here, we ask how domestication has altered genetic architecture by comparing the genetic architecture of 18 domestication traits in maize and its ancestor teosinte using matched populations. We observed a strongly reduced number of QTL for domestication traits in maize relative to teosinte, which is consistent with the previously reported depletion of additive variance by selection during domestication. We also observed more dominance in maize than teosinte, likely a consequence of selective removal of additive variants. We observed that large effect QTL have low minor allele frequency (MAF) in both maize and teosinte. Regions of the genome that are strongly differentiated between teosinte and maize (high FST) explain less quantitative variation in maize than teosinte, suggesting that, in these regions, allelic variants were brought to (or near) fixation during domestication. We also observed that genomic regions of high recombination explain a disproportionately large proportion of heritable variance both before and after domestication. Finally, we observed that about 75% of the additive variance in both teosinte and maize is “missing” in the sense that it cannot be ascribed to detectable QTL and only 25% of variance maps to specific QTL. This latter result suggests that morphological evolution during domestication is largely attributable to very large numbers of QTL of very small effect.
Author summary Although the genetics of trait differences between crops and their progenitors has been extensively studied, far less is known about the genetic architecture of trait variation in crop progenitors and how this architecture was altered during domestication. Here, we address this issue by comparing the genetic architecture of 18 domestication traits in maize and its ancestor teosinte using matched populations. Our results show that genetic architecture was reshaped during domestication in multiple ways. Maize has a greatly reduced number of QTL for domestication traits relative to teosinte and alleles at these QTL show greater dominance in maize. QTL alleles of large effect are present in both maize and teosinte, but more common in maize. We observed that regions of the genome that are strongly differentiated between teosinte and maize (high FST) explain less additive variation in maize than teosinte and that genomic regions of high recombination explain a disproportionately large proportion of heritable variance both before and after domestication. Finally, we observed that about 75% of heritability is “missing” in the sense that it not associated with detectable QTL, which suggests that the raw material for domestication was largely composed of vast numbers of QTL of diminishingly small effects.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje